From nobody Mon Jan 08 17:12:06 2024 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4T80y86TtLz567r7 for ; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [96.47.72.83]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4T80y85xdFz4k05; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1704734000; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3bum2VS9rzTHM6ObNvINxQwzTrrEQ/fkajhZ0/7f98o=; b=q1btE6LZzs9Mbu2wSbv3JJjUAl5cWcdLNi1XXYYwSM6Qms1ovs2zIYuqApQQ/hpbiyN5l/ dlsmiJi/J16KhPlOqCZFDD0xBoMn13m9STcqYZQ4J3/uWDTKUhhnmyjR85DQXxgd3vS6LG ey0C3eQYF0K8JlO258b1WALvncN4c5gWTRETFNy8ZJ/EWuPKJaUKIKUatjTRIauiOhqX+S gXFabnkTMOOswrGsPTx5Iq3+5Zzfx368frKaK393XKp/p4JYnL1Z53tjktoP8BWZsgQW8H c560JnjTp8z2YdBWL6/GQ45lkacrbCsRVPGwlqiIR02o6KqInBOt8ya9eIDdAQ== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1704734000; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=3bum2VS9rzTHM6ObNvINxQwzTrrEQ/fkajhZ0/7f98o=; b=koo0W1CVDkR6pnUK+JEt16eZFg90s4aH1+Hw3bptBLVYJ6B4ukEzDgvZmuWTSCW0UKIv0r J3cspE/AdLv1nq1h2ByEbwuz84R3rTO/xtK1w++TvLemHu9C6KY3Ae7rkK8GBXsn5SzXKi MKWzZVbYJpFS4iVfyxuE87BcTwIhue+74LIby8q+LjnzCfSFk/MfCWlu3kqdSf/7yNu+fy b+Q1GOMFsggw0Zx7jmeacQsFOVgLeJe3T3z8Hu1zB+qaNrqWQ54L6s2T5yql6xnMhlsAau by0E6PNZJOcjNjEJLfpzyEg7p+wZJPD9D0DsSHM4rlctwvEqnI8kOk+oMYlIiQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1704734000; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hg4RP3E/WBUBhoG/W6CvKD6qObrdgF7J2LlTrgHJFanumrS7nnB7fdyrwbCyMwY1L2EYsF ZLwJm7Mysu+IAQndc3GyTWJGe3dvVvh1tfNH0kCtgPTeVaimMZneUv84MWCm8NVNDzAJip WMzv2S1K/QZU5siaN8Mtm4quY+uSDkFKzpm6XpV/095BnZ2ouoUGbcib/NORNiMCAxpoFK Em0RoGlfw+1GDVHKE7TTEJCCBytNXz0yw2PYqr4r1xaKAynxWXu9o3ZJZY806gDKJwHOUW mq8w/OXJWr4knashp7mKtlD9OiRLiMGQlwUrTWusG/QAXHGzWpT3GONqfbXOkQ== Received: from smtp.theravensnest.org (smtp.theravensnest.org [45.77.103.195]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: theraven) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4T80y84sCGz1DRY; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:13:20 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from theraven@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtpclient.apple (host81-141-223-70.range81-141.btcentralplus.com [81.141.223.70]) by smtp.theravensnest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 90A4BBCD4; Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:13:19 +0000 (GMT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3774.200.91.1.1\)) Subject: Re: Move u2f-devd into base? From: David Chisnall In-Reply-To: <20240109013058.22807f3816603829316cef4c@dec.sakura.ne.jp> Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2024 17:12:06 +0000 Cc: Warner Losh , Christian Weisgerber , FreeBSD Current Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <20240109013058.22807f3816603829316cef4c@dec.sakura.ne.jp> To: Tomoaki AOKI X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3774.200.91.1.1) On 8 Jan 2024, at 16:30, Tomoaki AOKI wrote: >=20 > So it should be in ports to adapt for latest products more quickly = than > in base, I think. We push out a new release of each of the -STABLE branches every 6 months = and can do ENs if a product ships and becomes popular in under six = months. This shouldn=E2=80=99t be a reason to not do things in the base = system. Streamlining the process for ENs (automating them so that there=E2=80=99s = a simple flow from review request for a commit on a stable branch to = generating the binaries and sending out the announcement) would help a = lot and would almost certainly make Colin happier about his workload. David