Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK
- In reply to: Herbert J. Skuhra: "Re: Request for Testing: TCP RACK"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 23:08:58 UTC
> On Nov 16, 2023, at 13:06, Herbert J. Skuhra <herbert@gojira.at> wrote: > > Hi, > > On Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:13:05 +0100, tuexen@freebsd.org wrote: >> >> Dear all, >> >> recently the main branch was changed to build the TCP RACK stack >> which is a loadable kernel module, by default: >> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=3a338c534154164504005beb00a3c6feb03756cc >> >> As discussed on the bi-weekly transport call, it would be great if people >> could test the RACK stack for their workload. Please report any problems to the >> net@ mailing list or open an issue in the bug tracker and drop me a note via email. >> This includes regressions in CPU usage, regressions in performance or any other >> unexpected change you observe. >> >> You can load the kernel module using >> kldload tcp_rack >> >> You can make the RACK stack the default stack using >> sysctl net.inet.tcp.functions_default=rack >> >> Based on the feedback we get, the default stack might be switched to the >> RACK stack. >> >> Please let me know if you have any questions. > > I am running main-n266450-a592812327de with a GENERIC-NODEBUG kernel. > > # kldload tcp_rack > kldload: an error occurred while loading module tcp_rack. Please check > dmesg(8) for more details. > > In dmesg: > KLD tcp_rack.ko: depends on tcphpts - not available or version mismatch > linker_load_file: /boot/kernel/tcp_rack.ko - unsupported file type > > So you have to build a kernel with "options TCPHPTS" first? Hi Herbert, yes this is correct. For whatever reason I was assuming the TCPHPTS is already enabled in all configs, but this is not correct. Will put up an review to do this tomorrow. Thanks for reporting. Best regards Michael > > -- > Herbert