Re: MOTD is not created correctly (since 2022/02/18)
- In reply to: Garance A Drosehn : "Re: MOTD is not created correctly (since 2022/02/18)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 24 May 2023 22:32:45 UTC
Garance A Drosehn <gad@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Not that it helps you much, but I did notice it and have an alternate
> version of rc.d/motd on my own systems. I had no particular attachment
> to the earlier format, so my motd starts out by printing the two lines
> of:
> ```
> -KU 1302505 1302505 -b 18fa15f83c483db67b818e3a48bbb312908754b1
> FreeBSD 13.2-STABLE (Garance-13x) #0 -- Fri May 5 17:53:55 EDT 2023
I too was actually not all that fussed with the old style, but the
multiple spaces in the output bugged me, so I was going to change it
back, when I stumbled on the issue.
I actually have closer to yours in my ssh-banner:
****************** <catflap.dyslexicfish.net> ******************
FreeBSD/amd64 13.2-STABLE - Build 1302505 (May 13, 2023)
23:25 BST up 1 01:30 0.16, 0.18, 0.16
-- SOD OFF IF YOU AREN'T AUTHORISED
****************************************************************
> But I thought that committing that would trigger a bikeshed debate, so I
> also have an option to produce the output we previously had. And given
> that no one seemed to be complaining about the "full uname" version, I
> figured I had an option for that too. And then I thought all these
> options
> were overkill and would trigger and even longer debate, so I never
> brought
> the ideas forward. :)
:-)
Oh yeah, definitely! It would be worse than the fractional seconds in
sleep(1) debate!
Cheers, for the response,
Jamie