From nobody Wed Mar 08 14:26:52 2023 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PWvlZ3CPsz3wS9k for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:27:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-lf1-f51.google.com (mail-lf1-f51.google.com [209.85.167.51]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PWvlX6DXSz3HLR; Wed, 8 Mar 2023 14:27:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of carpeddiem@gmail.com designates 209.85.167.51 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=carpeddiem@gmail.com; dmarc=none Received: by mail-lf1-f51.google.com with SMTP id k14so21567376lfj.7; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 06:27:04 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; t=1678285622; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=Pgd6Ka7lar5cymgHELGuYO157qU7NtptxBTqLLhabfQ=; b=MCHT97f+k3W6jJT57zoD7TMuAFFzA9nxy4L5N288wZ2wPt2JEhhaGWH9EWddHV2MRa L4nKOzzE3y0uUl9cJGtIYdmb7jZH/70kIriul5YG2HBDHw59cWDL8qcRi3mC5Z3KyQtQ XSAgu04Qvxg/oi00nR9y9F/VANh9H8NjSpT4sQL1ekICI++Ua4KBEW0u7WdoM7brXcgu /nI1mYirg6i0jn+EnnXocqd6EA1ha3CSaytBLblynsV2giS6XwzHLym6F2yTYeAXPfr1 uvd0IAcprvv+Le3doV7juWO1JLFrjj1aZFnUK4faK/lCODpTg/nloCePSYiz5ee77ICq A9SQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKWJkQhHtyxT4t6D7BgXGJK62Pz0MDdcRdtxRe6nyIajUGJzZlLc w3i9tTHr4EMWjs4F63RNU8+aR0NNp0yaebKISL7oTRpj X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set+oHZYw6SXyjDTRsV7FFdjSItpY4GUBcFUKHs1fi5BPM8YFjIN3QzzQDQkr2lqJQ9/tu0jtCxW89JFjR9eOrr0= X-Received: by 2002:a19:f00f:0:b0:4dd:ab9a:24a4 with SMTP id p15-20020a19f00f000000b004ddab9a24a4mr5577075lfc.5.1678285621970; Wed, 08 Mar 2023 06:27:01 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20230227192011.08f7aa8e@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <720721A7-B1ED-405B-98EB-04A3AFCA7FD5@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <1F3F20A1-C2BC-4A33-ABFD-D20F4ADB67E8@FreeBSD.org> <20230302064153.12940fa8@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> <6321CA49-A38A-4FC6-A41E-E9964C2A94E3@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <6321CA49-A38A-4FC6-A41E-E9964C2A94E3@FreeBSD.org> From: Ed Maste Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 09:26:52 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: NanoBSD: CURRENT unable to compile 13-STABLE : error: a function definition without a prototype is deprecated ... in C To: Dimitry Andric Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.99 / 15.00]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.99)[-0.989]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.167.51:from]; MLMMJ_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.167.51:from]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FREEMAIL_ENVFROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[carpeddiem]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[emaste@freebsd.org,carpeddiem@gmail.com]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PWvlX6DXSz3HLR X-Spamd-Bar: -- X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, 2 Mar 2023 at 05:14, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > WITHOUT_SYSTEM_COMPILER > Do not opportunistically skip building a cross-compiler during > the bootstrap phase of the build. Normally, if the currently ... > I find the double negative phrasing "do not skip" always confusing. But > the logic is normally: Yes, it's confusing -- perhaps we could rewrite it as something like "Build a cross-compiler during the build bootstrap phase, rather than opportunistically using the host's compiler."