Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: /lib/libc.so.7 vs. __libc_start1@FBSD_1.7 in main [so: 14] recently ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2023 21:05:16 UTC
On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 10:22 PM Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > [Warner answered my specific question separately. This is about > something else.] > > On Apr 23, 2023, at 20:57, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Apr 23, 2023 at 9:40 PM Simon J. Gerraty <sjg@juniper.net> > wrote: > >> Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > >> > I will not get into why, but I executed a git built for 1400082 > >> > in a 1400081 world context and got what was to me a surprise, > >> > given that /lib/libc.so.7 is part of 13.2-RELEASE : > >> > > >> > ld-elf.so.1: /usr/local/bin/git: Undefined symbol > "__libc_start1@FBSD_1.7" > >> > >> This is a symptom of trying to run a prog built for target on a host > >> which is not the same. > >> > >> I hit this a lot recently while updating Makefile.depend files for > >> userland. > >> > >> There are a number of makefiles (eg for sh, csh, awk) which need to run > >> a tool on the host to generate something. > >> When trying to build 14.0 on a 13.1 host each of those tools failed with > >> the above issue until actually built for the host. > > > > Your path is messed up then. We always run (a copy of) the host's > binaries > > for these tools. > > For the kernel's vers.c generation, git is used but > does not get a build of its own under buildworld or > buildkernel as far as I know: not a bootstrap or > staged tool. > Correct. The host's git is assumed to always be good and always executing in a sane env. And you can just remove / take git out of the path if you hit problems here. > > If you were running the 14 binaries on 13 as part of the > > build process, the path is messed up. I'm not surprised for dirdep > > since it doesn't do all the staging activities that buildworld. > > git use is not covered by buildworld or kernel-toolchain > staging activities as far as I know. > > Is git the only example of such for things used by buildworld > or buildkernel ? > buildkernel is the only place I know that git is used to get the tip of git branch for messages. I think that reproducible builds omit this. Warner > >> AFAIK the non-DIRDEPS_BUILD build does a separate pass through the tree > >> to do the target build-tools to build these things. > > > > Yes and no... We copy the host's tools when we can, and build a matched > set of > > binary and libraries when the host one isn't good enough. I think it's a > path > > issue you are seeing... > > > > Also, "copy" isn't a physical copy because macos hates copied binaries > due to security concerns. > > > >> > >> The DIRDEPS_BUILD uses a pseudo MACHINE "host" to deal with such things, > >> ideally those tools would be built in a subdirectory of sh, csh etc, so > >> that one can choose to build only that tool if desired - sometimes you > >> want to build the app (eg awk) for the host as well but usually not. > > > > Yea, buildworld deals with this by creating new binaries and installing > them in > > a special directory, which is somewhat similar (though we always build > > them rather than on demand like dirdep hopes to do). > > > === > Mark Millard > marklmi at yahoo.com > > >