Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current
- Reply: Steve Kargl : "Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: Profiled libraries on freebsd-current"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 19:51:12 UTC
On 2022-Apr-29, at 12:38, Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com> wrote: > https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=175841285e289edebb6603da39f02549521ce950 > says the following (later), but first I quote the part tbat dirves the > interpretation: > > QUOTE > Clang's -pg support and mcount() remain, so building with -pg can still > be used on code that the user builds; we just do not provide prebuilt > libraries compiled with -pg. > END QUOTE > > No WITH_PROFILE options means no "prebuilt libraries compiled with -pg". > > > The overall notice was: > > author Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> 2021-06-27 17:21:26 +0000 > committer Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org> 2021-06-28 15:36:59 +0000 > commit 175841285e289edebb6603da39f02549521ce950 (patch) > tree 9c2d3b05546961457bb18faeebd2302a25559b49 > parent 243b95978debac3db06df6d26ca9f8d84f6cbd83 (diff) > download src-175841285e289edebb6603da39f02549521ce950.tar.gz > src-175841285e289edebb6603da39f02549521ce950.zip > > Add deprecation notice for WITH_PROFILE option > > As discussed on freebsd-current [1] and freebsd-arch [2] and review > D30833, FreeBSD 14 will ship without the _p.a libraries built with -pg. > Both upstream and base system (in commit b762974cf4b9) Clang have been > modified to remove the special case for linking against these libraries. > > Clang's -pg support and mcount() remain, so building with -pg can still > be used on code that the user builds; we just do not provide prebuilt > libraries compiled with -pg. A similar change is still needed for GCC. > > [1] > https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current/2020-January/075105.html > > [2] > https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arch/2021-June/000016.html > > > MFC after: 1 week > Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation > END QUOTE > I probably should have been explicit: the actual removal of WITH_PROFILE has not happened yet. So testing attempts to use it are not yet expected to have the new behavior yet. === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com