Re: I get odd time reports from poudriere on armv7 system, under a (non-debug) main [so: 14] FreeBSD.
- Reply: Bryan Drewery : "Re: I get odd time reports from poudriere on armv7 system, under a (non-debug) main [so: 14] FreeBSD."
- In reply to: Ian Lepore : "Re: I get odd time reports from poudriere on armv7 system, under a (non-debug) main [so: 14] FreeBSD."
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:05:46 UTC
On 2021-Sep-26, at 10:02, Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote: > On Sun, 2021-09-26 at 02:27 -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-current > wrote: >> On 2021-Sep-25, at 23:25, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote: >> >> >> [...] >> if (argc == 3 && strcmp(argv[2], "-nsec") == 0) >> printf("%ld.%ld\n", ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec); > > There are two problems with this, both the seconds and nanos are > printed incorrectly. The correct incantation would be > > printf("%jd.%09ld\n", (intmax_t)ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec); > Thanks Ian for looking into more than I did last night. Based on the following (up to possible e-mail white space issues), poudriere-devel seems t be working for reporting times: # more /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel/files/patch-clock --- src/libexec/poudriere/clock/clock.c.orig 2021-09-26 22:24:54.735485000 -0700 +++ src/libexec/poudriere/clock/clock.c 2021-09-26 11:46:12.076362000 -0700 @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@ * THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE. */ +#include <stdint.h> #include <err.h> #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> @@ -71,8 +72,8 @@ } else usage(); if (argc == 3 && strcmp(argv[2], "-nsec") == 0) - printf("%ld.%ld\n", ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec); + printf("%jd.%09ld\n", (intmax_t)ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec); else - printf("%ld\n", ts.tv_sec); + printf("%jd\n", (intmax_t)ts.tv_sec); return (EXIT_SUCCESS); } === Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com ( dsl-only.net went away in early 2018-Mar)