Re: I get odd time reports from poudriere on armv7 system, under a (non-debug) main [so: 14] FreeBSD.
- Reply: Bryan Drewery : "Re: I get odd time reports from poudriere on armv7 system, under a (non-debug) main [so: 14] FreeBSD."
- In reply to: Ian Lepore : "Re: I get odd time reports from poudriere on armv7 system, under a (non-debug) main [so: 14] FreeBSD."
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 06:05:46 UTC
On 2021-Sep-26, at 10:02, Ian Lepore <ian at freebsd.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-09-26 at 02:27 -0700, Mark Millard via freebsd-current
> wrote:
>> On 2021-Sep-25, at 23:25, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> [...]
>> if (argc == 3 && strcmp(argv[2], "-nsec") == 0)
>> printf("%ld.%ld\n", ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
>
> There are two problems with this, both the seconds and nanos are
> printed incorrectly. The correct incantation would be
>
> printf("%jd.%09ld\n", (intmax_t)ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
>
Thanks Ian for looking into more than I did last night.
Based on the following (up to possible e-mail white space issues),
poudriere-devel seems t be working for reporting times:
# more /usr/ports/ports-mgmt/poudriere-devel/files/patch-clock
--- src/libexec/poudriere/clock/clock.c.orig 2021-09-26 22:24:54.735485000 -0700
+++ src/libexec/poudriere/clock/clock.c 2021-09-26 11:46:12.076362000 -0700
@@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
* THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
*/
+#include <stdint.h>
#include <err.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
@@ -71,8 +72,8 @@
} else
usage();
if (argc == 3 && strcmp(argv[2], "-nsec") == 0)
- printf("%ld.%ld\n", ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
+ printf("%jd.%09ld\n", (intmax_t)ts.tv_sec, ts.tv_nsec);
else
- printf("%ld\n", ts.tv_sec);
+ printf("%jd\n", (intmax_t)ts.tv_sec);
return (EXIT_SUCCESS);
}
===
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)