From nobody Fri Sep 10 08:29:46 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 113C817A0E3F for ; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:29:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ej1-x62b.google.com (mail-ej1-x62b.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::62b]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H5TZT5YhXz4h7j; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 08:29:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gljennjohn@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ej1-x62b.google.com with SMTP id e21so2602567ejz.12; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 01:29:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references:reply-to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UOTXNqPYhv/j5M1Xm3fXPTiHWoxkVQ2BNL4ZDkdrt7c=; b=FOHO0sfhhaqlL9tAW3uanpV+hWREDyBidO9a8uIk4va2SGlCDFm0WsT71ldnxpnnhZ hJW0Dc5aodDhGJojYnBTfYgyEd2+FqQKEqxl61g4csRTyVbLuPO7TakAy7/CPpGQ68JU GkleRoJ0X7Zl9JOENwNUdyvqFxHZBbATcOOmCEt9ygtADZ23n2NNkWiHiokKtjRLlvFy TU71wlSWrn4qP4pCk7vzwFfepxxcYHFLNNGIxKv3yLiQpV8p4bEsRblbwtQKaMmKuwc5 7k4ZUCIu8BQdtDuf/NYEwrZeZur4u5bju/JUbbkR+excrixSfiXfanSzEZ1zZlKpSq5L Zi1Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:reply-to:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=UOTXNqPYhv/j5M1Xm3fXPTiHWoxkVQ2BNL4ZDkdrt7c=; b=Dk59KKsULrELgs3kRwURDGNX25XO0RSSH2d+MThv+Kd2sslK9MXnBQXG4N4+MpDML4 W0Y3WQvkv7obnFgZDxbAmCDMT+zxXBDdJtjgiTeWH4jLWNbSJ9ju1BRW10RVnuncPKWy NXctJo0KSLBMTR2ZDYRtRZSZQdEsjrSbqOvt+7iKzOZwMCAw/RartP0UMojxG4FIUGe6 STPrTCW6gm/aSbiPNVxe+mplJUMnfJ/yLVQ24k+hHphol1aG1hjFx7b9+DMmYnEixsfR HktvYw3HpF+H1D3NALYpAZWaUIfoTyCLzTSu1VedDiNg5oW84z3+a1iSwPAnj9V5ZjI/ Udgg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533xNMbNmZV/4Jv+yHKgmBIGiqjvCNiungL/Epl4+smGYcvmyVDn D1N4qgtVyLimCerU53IfSGf28kpCzpc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnESNmLCCdQgVu0SJMCApnNZi/CxBTw9NmWkokkn8b//dfjLyInvQ8gWc49UuzqFs/0cBv8Q== X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:a59:: with SMTP id x25mr8067880ejf.33.1631262587274; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 01:29:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ernst.home (p5b023517.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [91.2.53.23]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id eg14sm2431658edb.64.2021.09.10.01.29.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 10 Sep 2021 01:29:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 10:29:46 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn To: Ed Maste Cc: FreeBSD CURRENT Subject: Re: OpenSSH issue: 14-Current rejects non-publickey scp/ssh/rsync connectiosn all of the sudden Message-ID: <20210910082946.3f31c6e7@ernst.home> In-Reply-To: References: <20210909211530.5cf712d7@thor.intern.walstatt.dynvpn.de> Reply-To: gljennjohn@gmail.com X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.8 (GTK+ 2.24.33; amd64-portbld-freebsd14.0) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4H5TZT5YhXz4h7j X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 19:37:39 -0400 Ed Maste wrote: > On Thu, 9 Sept 2021 at 15:18, FreeBSD User wrote: > > > > /etc/ssh/sshd_config line 89: Unsupported option UsePAM > > Sorry, it turns out I had the wrong version of config.h in my commit. > > I'm running a build now and will commit it once a test with that > change passes. I will look into all of the reported issues, but I'd be > much obliged if you can rebuild sshd and try again (once the config.h > commit lands). > This is interesting. Was the config.h in the patch the same as the one you committed? When I ran my tests one machine was running the new ssh (from the patch) and the other was running the old ssh, and I didn't have any connection errors. -- Gary Jennejohn