Re: BUG in libm's powf
- Reply: Mark Murray : "Re: BUG in libm's powf"
- In reply to: Mark Murray : "Re: BUG in libm's powf"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 06 Sep 2021 17:53:18 UTC
Fine with me. I don't have a phabricator account and
bugzilla reports seems to get lost in the ether.
--
steve
On Mon, Sep 06, 2021 at 06:45:11PM +0100, Mark Murray wrote:
> Hi
>
> I've opened a Phab ticket for this. I hope that's OK?
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D31865
>
> M
>
> > On 6 Sep 2021, at 16:28, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> >
> > Paul Zimmermann has identified a bug in Openlibm's powf(),
> > which is identical to FreeBSD's libm. Both derived from
> > fdlibm. https://github.com/JuliaMath/openlibm/issues/212.
> >
> > Consider
> >
> > % cat h.c
> > #include <math.h>
> > #include <stdio.h>
> > int
> > main(void)
> > {
> > float x, y, z;
> > x = 0x1.ffffecp-1F;
> > y = -0x1.000002p+27F;
> > z = 0x1.557a86p115F;
> > printf("%e %e %e <-- should be %e\n", x, y, powf(x,y), z);
> > return 0;
> > }
> >
> > % cc -o h -fno-builtin h.c -lm && ./h
> > 9.999994e-01 -1.342177e+08 inf <-- should be 5.540807e+34
> >
> > Note, clang seems to have a builtin for powf(), but one cannot
> > count of clang being the only consumer of libm. With the patch
> > at the end of this email, I get
> >
> > % cc -o h -fno-builtin h.c -L/home/kargl/trunk/math/libm/msun -lmath && ./h
> > 9.999994e-01 -1.342177e+08 5.540807e+34 <-- should be 5.540807e+34
> >
> > Watch for copy and paste whitespace corruption.
> >
> > --- /usr/src/lib/msun/src/e_powf.c 2021-02-21 03:29:00.956878000 -0800
> > +++ src/e_powf.c 2021-09-06 08:17:09.800008000 -0700
> > @@ -136,7 +136,7 @@
> > /* |y| is huge */
> > if(iy>0x4d000000) { /* if |y| > 2**27 */
> > /* over/underflow if x is not close to one */
> > - if(ix<0x3f7ffff7) return (hy<0)? sn*huge*huge:sn*tiny*tiny;
> > + if(ix<0x3f7ffff6) return (hy<0)? sn*huge*huge:sn*tiny*tiny;
> > if(ix>0x3f800007) return (hy>0)? sn*huge*huge:sn*tiny*tiny;
> > /* now |1-x| is tiny <= 2**-20, suffice to compute
> > log(x) by x-x^2/2+x^3/3-x^4/4 */
> >
> >
> > --
> > Steve
> >
>
> --
> Mark R V Murray
>
--
Steve