From nobody Mon Oct 25 16:47:18 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4F54180AAEE for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:47:38 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: from mail-ed1-f45.google.com (mail-ed1-f45.google.com [209.85.208.45]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4HdLV16hxSz4pQK for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 16:47:37 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sobomax@sippysoft.com) Received: by mail-ed1-f45.google.com with SMTP id j10so2095352eds.12 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:47:37 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Tk1YkY5FN5UxYvpS120Bs2/pv6LOzW1Bt9+Hlxe5vog=; b=6JsSKN3FpkA1yvHrOL3ffeoaMVHnBDFNCJoQd2+BbJ3Vn1fhB+BlMUhj7YzZo41bRz ahVqmpqX3YiQMoZpuAgkOWctiHsiO4TqwwCWYvCABspgtXp/l6+FlIJjZg+TePDrikq+ UNwbpxurINOfr+YfEpJinrcqXSlwkTPMuKEsTcVD7dRw8av8E06TnBkvgPza7bJTFWhE AaVLs0xCNai5jqj4zgRoVGDyoYrTfsFmd5AajwPIUgNKZVPcL8GsvIwlzWUaQawXzres PrvVgkYMLAihJIgMq6Zr9xjSA1GQ6xeXhTxd0JQMaPmY00QjkyMa4EHzmeVgUkJyJrqI KL6g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531l8uxRZxgKiXZEsgEYbhlPdRDvrSGKKly0EwLLet2j5X+h45gE JrDZJ6WNbv/tZdvVM/N1JlSUxBG0WP+RRHf2zITMMuyQPUxqH3Fw X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw3pmiWp/6Nz3IXFaP/8+77Rsf+kFE2ABHVGb181r4icpiCN6tpg5lMHEmW4D+OtzE9IR6O6lLvCgyag/JO+Fc= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:5e55:: with SMTP id b21mr16387782eju.58.1635180449335; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:47:29 -0700 (PDT) List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20211022212947.GA59184@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <20211022212947.GA59184@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> From: Maxim Sobolev Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 09:47:18 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Future of ident(1) To: Steve Kargl Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d39ea705cf301df7" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4HdLV16hxSz4pQK X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sobomax@sippysoft.com designates 209.85.208.45 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=sobomax@sippysoft.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-0.76 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.998]; FREEFALL_USER(0.00)[sobomax]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:209.85.128.0/17]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.29)[-0.289]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[multipart/alternative,text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-current@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.52)[0.525]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[209.85.208.45:from]; FORGED_SENDER(0.30)[sobomax@freebsd.org,sobomax@sippysoft.com]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_POSSIBLE(0.00)[209.85.208.45:from]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+,1:+,2:~]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[sobomax@freebsd.org,sobomax@sippysoft.com]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: Y --000000000000d39ea705cf301df7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Just in case someone thinks this is something useful, I've got a PR filed against git to implement custom $Id$. There are no technical issues with the change but Git developers are not very keen on merging it in, since they see this as an obscure feature, no one needs. :-/ So if anyone wants to chime in on GitHub or git mailing list please do so. https://github.com/git/git/pull/1074 Thanks! -Max On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 2:30 PM Steve Kargl < sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote: > All, > > With the new world order, what is the future of ident(1)? > Should it be removed from base? Given a compiled binary > in base, how does one find the equivalent git info that > ident(1) used to perform? > > Having a few minutes to dust off old patchs for libm, should > I remove $FreeBSD$ tags in files I touch? For new files, is > it expected that useless $FreeBSD$ tags should be added? > > -- > Steve > > --000000000000d39ea705cf301df7--