Re: Missing Copyright?

Warner,

Thanks for the quick response.

If I have time I'll rig up my build to disable the use of 
assembly routines on x86_64 and any compiler builtin functions
to do some testing of these routines.

On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 10:05:38PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Done.
> https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=3550a49f6814af38c21b0033ef8746953451dade
> 
> Since the license is a verbatim copy of the standard SPDX license, I tagged
> it using our draft license policy's
> suggested SPDX-License-Identifier: tag.
> 
> Warner
> 
> On Fri, Oct 22, 2021 at 9:14 PM Steve Kargl <
> sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> wrote:
> 
> > It seems that git commit f5542795b99206a2b4e5a57429d18b9478264e24
> > replaced the fdlibm implementations of s_scalbn.c, s_scalbnf.c,
> > and s_scalbnl.c by those in MUSL.  There are no Copyright
> > notices in these files.  There is no statement to the originals
> > of these files within the files.
> >
> > If one looks at https://git.musl-libc.org/cgit/musl/tree/COPYRIGHT
> > one finds:
> >
> > musl as a whole is licensed under the following standard MIT license:
> >

(trimmed)

-- 
Steve