Re: clang/llvm-tblgen --- ld: error: undefined symbol: setupterm

On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, 5:15 PM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
wrote:

> On Sat, Oct 09, 2021 at 04:47:35PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021 at 11:09 AM Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >
> > > On 9 Oct 2021, at 15:40, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Sat, Oct 9, 2021, 5:59 AM Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > > On 9 Oct 2021, at 13:37, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On 9 Oct 2021, at 09:46, FreeBSD User <freebsd@walstatt-de.de>
> wrote:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> On recent CURRENT (FreeBSD 14.0-CURRENT #2
> main-n249971-0525ece3554e:
> > > > >> Fri Oct  8 15:17:34 CEST 2021 amd64) building of an 13-STABLE
> based
> > > > >> appliance failed very early in the build process of the 13-STABLE
> > > > >> sources as shown below. 13-STABLE is most recent, since the
> sources
> > > are
> > > > >> fetched every time the build process is triggered.
> > > > > ...
> > > > >>
> > > /pool/home/ohartmann/Projects/router/router/apu2c4/src/tools/install.sh
> > > > >> -s -o root -g wheel -m 555   compile_et
> > > > >> /pool/home/ohartmann/Projects/router/router/apu2
> > > > >>
> > >
> c4/world/amd64/ALERICH_13-STABLE_amd64/pool/home/ohartmann/Projects/router/router/apu2c4/src/amd64.amd64/tmp/legacy/usr/bin/compile_et
> > > > >> --- _bootstrap-tools-usr.bin/clang/llvm-tblgen --- ld: error:
> > > undefined
> > > > >> symbol: setupterm
> > > > >>>>> referenced by Process.cpp
> > > > >>>>>
> > >  Process.o:(llvm::sys::Process::FileDescriptorHasColors(int))
> > > > >
> > > > > It is complaining about ncurses functions; it seems that even
> though
> > > the link step gets -lncursesw added, it still is not able to find the
> > > symbol:
> > > >
> > > > Okay, this is because recently on -CURRENT, libtinfow got split off
> from
> > > > libncursesw: https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/commit/?id=396851c20aebd
> > > >
> > > > This affects such cross-builds obviously, and manually adding
> -ltinfow
> > > > to the link command line makes it link correctly.
> > > >
> > > > However, the 396851c20aebd commit is probably not suitable for
> MFC'ing
> > > > to stable/13. Maybe we need to put some kind of kludge in
> > > > share/mk/src.libnames.mk for this, or in the top-level
> Makefile.inc1?
> > > >
> > > > Baptiste, any ideas? :)
> > > >
> > > > Add setupterm() to libegacy as a nop.
> > >
> > > That's not enough I think, it requires more ncurses functions than just
> > > setupterm. And it actually calls them and checks the return values too,
> > > IIRC. :)
> > >
> >
> > int setupterm(const char *t, int fd, int *errptr) { return OK; }
> > int tigetnum(const char *t) { return 0; }
> > TERMINAL *set_curterm(TERMINAL *t) { return NULL; }
> > int del_curterm(TERMINAL *t) { return OK; }
> >
> > should do the trick. I'll see just how crazy an idea this might be
> > since we're trying to get the first stage tool to work on a -current
> > host. the only thing that clang is really using is tigetnum to see
> > if the terminal has color. Returning 0 tells it no.
> >
> > Or we could contrive, during bootstrap, to ensure that
> > LLVM_ENABLE_TERMINFO is not defined. Nobody ever needs
> > color error messages. They are nice to have, sure, but are not
> > strictly needed if the alternative is monochrome error messages
> > while building the system. There's already an ifdef protecting it:
> >
> > /* Define if the setupterm() function is supported this platform. */
> > #if defined(__FreeBSD__)
> > /*
> >  * This is only needed for terminalHasColors(). When disabled LLVM falls
> > back
> >  * to checking a list of TERM prefixes which is sufficient for a
> bootstrap
> > tool.
> >  */
> > #define LLVM_ENABLE_TERMINFO 1
> > #endif
> >
> > It would be easy enough to add a && !defined(LLVM_BOOTSTRAP_BUILD)
> > or similar.
>
> I do not quite understand how would it help.
> You need to add this to HEAD sources back in time, not to the current
> sources.
>

Once merged, this would get stable building on current. But not older
versions of stable, it is true. It's worth doing for that reason alone
unless there's something clever we've not thought of yet with the current
host.

Warner

>