Re: HEADS-UP: ASLR for 64-bit executables enabled by default on main

From: Kristof Provost <kp_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2021 02:32:22 UTC
> On 18 Nov 2021, at 11:43, Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> wrote:
> czw., 18 lis 2021 o 19:07 Li-Wen Hsu <lwhsu@freebsd.org> napisał(a):
>> 
>>> On Wed, Nov 17, 2021 at 6:30 AM Marcin Wojtas <mw@semihalf.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> As of b014e0f15bc7 the ASLR (Address Space Layout
>>> Randomization) feature becomes enabled for the all 64-bit
>>> binaries by default.
>>> 
>>> Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) is an exploit mitigation
>>> technique implemented in the majority of modern operating systems.
>>> It involves randomly positioning the base address of an executable
>>> and the position of libraries, heap, and stack, in a process's address
>>> space. Although over the years ASLR proved to not guarantee full OS
>>> security on its own, this mechanism can make exploitation more difficult
>>> (especially when combined with other methods, such as W^X).
>>> 
>>> Tests on the tier 1 64-bit architectures demonstrated that the ASLR is
>>> stable and does not result in noticeable performance degradation,
>>> therefore it is considered safe to enable this mechanism by default.
>>> Moreover its effectiveness is increased for PIE (Position Independent
>>> Executable) binaries. Thanks to commit 9a227a2fd642 ("Enable PIE by
>>> default on 64-bit architectures"), building from src is not necessary
>>> to have PIE binaries and it is enough to control usage of ASLR in the
>>> OS solely by setting the appropriate sysctls. The defaults were toggled
>>> for the 64-bit PIE and non-PIE executables.
>>> 
>>> As for the drawbacks, a consequence of using the ASLR is more
>>> significant VM fragmentation, hence the issues may be encountered
>>> in the systems with a limited address space in high memory consumption
>>> cases, such as buildworld. As a result, although the tests on 32-bit
>>> architectures with ASLR enabled were mostly on par with what was
>>> observed on 64-bit ones, the defaults for the former are not changed
>>> at this time. Also, for the sake of safety the feature remains disabled
>>> for 32-bit executables on 64-bit machines, too.
>>> 
>>> The committed change affects the overall OS operation, so the
>>> following should be taken into consideration:
>>> * Address space fragmentation.
>>> * A changed ABI due to modified layout of address space.
>>> * More complicated debugging due to:
>>>  * Non-reproducible address space layout between runs.
>>>  * Some debuggers automatically disable ASLR for spawned processes,
>>>    making target's environment different between debug and
>>>    non-debug runs.
>>> 
>>> The known issues (such as PR239873 or PR253208) have been fixed in
>>> HEAD up front, however please pay attention to the system behavior after
>>> upgrading the kernel to the newest revisions.
>>> In order to confirm/rule-out the dependency of any encountered issue
>>> on ASLR it is strongly advised to re-run the test with the feature
>>> disabled - it can be done by setting the following sysctls
>>> in the /etc/sysctl.conf file:
>>> kern.elf64.aslr.enable=0
>>> kern.elf64.aslr.pie_enable=0
>>> 
>>> The change is a result of combined efforts under the auspices
>>> of the FreeBSD Foundation and the Semihalf team sponsored
>>> by Stormshield.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Marcin
>> 
>> Thanks very much for working on this. FYI, there are some test cases
>> seem to be affected by this:
>> 
>> https://ci.freebsd.org/job/FreeBSD-main-amd64-test/19828/testReport/
>> 
>> The mkimg ones are a bit tricky, it seems the output is changed in
>> each run. We may need a way to generate reproducible results..
>> 
>> I'm still checking them, but hope more people can join and fix them.
>> 
> 
> Thanks for bringing this up! Apart from
> sys.netpfil.common.dummynet.pf_nat other are 23 are new.

I’ve just managed to reproduce that one locally (it only happens if ipfw is also loaded) and will dig in soon. It’s not going to be aslr related. You can ignore that failure. 

Kristof