Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity
- Reply: Ceri Davies : "Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity"
- Reply: Michael Gmelin : "Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity"
- In reply to: Ceri Davies : "Re: Reducing SIGINFO verbosity"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 14:36:49 UTC
On Fri, May 21, 2021 at 7:38 AM Ceri Davies <ceri@submonkey.net> wrote: > On Thu, May 20, 2021 at 03:57:17PM -0700, Conrad Meyer wrote: > > No, I don’t think there’s any reason to default it differently on stable > vs > > current. I think it’s useful (and I prefer the more verbose form, which > > isn’t the default). > > I agree that there's no reason for the default to be different, but I > would say that it is much easier for someone who knows that there is a > default to be changed to change it, than it is for someone who does not. > Therefore, if the information is not useful to someone who does not know > how to get rid of it, then it should default to not being displayed, > IMHO. > I plan on changing the default for non-INVARIANT kernels back to the old behavior. INVARIANT kernels will keep this behavior because it's a debugging kernel and this is one more thing to help debugging problems. Warner