Re: wpa_supplicant: SIGBUS after main-n247052-d40cd26a86a7 -> main-n247092-ec7b47fc81b2

From: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com>
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 21:46:36 -0700
In message <72A5E40F-C973-473C-B2A4-ACDD28685FD8_at_yahoo.com>, Mark Millard 
write
s:
> Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com> wrote on:
> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2021 14:02:06 -0700 :
>
> > Can you provide me with a backtrace, using the bt command, please.
>
>
> That was in the original message from David W. A copy was
> in the reply that you sent to the list as well:
>
> > > (gdb) bt
> > > #0  0x00000000010fb34f in wpa_sm_rx_eapol ()
> > > #1  0x00000000010f3afe in l2_packet_receive ()
> > > #2  0x0000000001122ef3 in eloop_run ()
> > > #3  0x00000000010b44a8 in wpa_supplicant_run ()
> > > #4  0x000000000109fdec in main ()
>
> But it also had this report about the context:
>
> > > (No debugging symbols found in /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/usr.sbin/wpa/
> wp=
> > > a_supplicant/wpa_supplicant)
>
>
> So it was apparently a non-debug build without symbols, limiting
> the information that is available.

Correct. We have debug symbols now and are chasing it down. I suspect a 
static function address in a structure may be incorrect.


-- 
Cheers,
Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert_at_cschubert.com>
FreeBSD UNIX:  <cy_at_FreeBSD.org>   Web:  https://FreeBSD.org
NTP:           <cy_at_nwtime.org>    Web:  https://nwtime.org

	The need of the many outweighs the greed of the few.
Received on Wed Jun 02 2021 - 04:46:36 UTC

Original text of this message