From nobody Sat Dec 18 03:52:22 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5FE418EA5DA; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 03:52:30 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (troutmask.apl.washington.edu [128.95.76.21]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "troutmask", Issuer "troutmask" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JGBkj3879z3L0c; Sat, 18 Dec 2021 03:52:29 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: from troutmask.apl.washington.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1) with ESMTPS id 1BI3qMI9068936 (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:52:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu) Received: (from sgk@localhost) by troutmask.apl.washington.edu (8.16.1/8.16.1/Submit) id 1BI3qMNs068935; Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:52:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from sgk) Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 19:52:22 -0800 From: Steve Kargl To: Mark Murray Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: What to do about tgammal? Message-ID: <20211218035222.GA68916@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> References: <20211204185352.GA20452@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <20211213022223.GA41440@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <813F29E3-8478-4282-9518-5943DE7B5492@FreeBSD.org> <20211214215106.GA50381@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4JGBkj3879z3L0c X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=none; dmarc=fail reason="No valid SPF, No valid DKIM" header.from=washington.edu (policy=none); spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu has no SPF policy when checking 128.95.76.21) smtp.mailfrom=sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-2.00 / 15.00]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; DMARC_POLICY_SOFTFAIL(0.10)[washington.edu : No valid SPF, No valid DKIM,none]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-0.999]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.999]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:73, ipnet:128.95.0.0/16, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On Tue, Dec 14, 2021 at 10:21:55PM +0000, Mark Murray wrote: > On 14 Dec 2021, at 21:51, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Interval max ULP x at Max ULP > > [6,1755.1] 0.873414 at 1.480588145237629047468e+03 > > [1.0662,6] 0.861508 at 1.999467927053585410537e+00 > > [1.01e-17,1.0661] 0.938041 at 1.023286481537296307856e+00 > > [-1.9999,-1.0001] 3.157770 at -1.246957268051453610329e+00 > > [-2.9999,-2.0001] 2.987659 at -2.220949465449893090070e+00 > > > > Note, 1.01e-17 can be reduced to soemthing like 1.01e-19 or > > Extra diffs most welcome! > Hi Mark, Don't know if you noticed, but I borroewed a few cpu cycles from grimoire. My WIP is already better than the imprecise.c kludge from theraven@. I need to work out the details of computing logl(x) in extra precision or see if I can leverage what Bruce did a few years ago. Anywho, current results: Interval tested for tgammal: [128,1755] count: 1000000 xm = 1.71195767195767195767195767195767183e+03L libm = 7.79438030237108165017007606176403036e+4790L mpfr = 7.79438030237108165017007606175285456e+4790L ULP = 14869.19517 Interval tested for tgammal: [16,128] count: 1000000 xm = 1.27687183687183687183687183687183690e+02L libm = 6.61421998891483212224382625339007663e+212L mpfr = 6.61421998891483212224382625338960267e+212L ULP = 731.00958 Interval tested for tgammal: [10,16] count: 1000000 xm = 1.54261654261654261654261654261654251e+01L libm = 2.74203137295418912508367515208072654e+11L mpfr = 2.74203137295418912508367515208073861e+11L ULP = 45.61161 Interval tested for tgammal: [1.2446e-60,10] count: 1000000 xm = 6.26200626138006138006138006138006065e-02L libm = 1.54507103764516989381203274093299079e+01L mpfr = 1.54507103764516989381203274093299091e+01L ULP = 0.76751 -- Steve