Re: Any Cronyx Tau* (ce(4) or cp(4)) users ?
- In reply to: Gleb Smirnoff : "Re: Any Cronyx Tau* (ce(4) or cp(4)) users ?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 16:54:35 UTC
On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 07:53:10AM -0800, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
T> P.S. If you really wish to deprecate something, I can suggest you to
T> sacrifice sbni(4) :)
P.P.S.
The driver actually provides a historical example: a driver removed,
later appeared not only used by somebody but even having a
responding vendor:
commit ceee59fa5ac606fe28b18086dd07f526ef717f55
Author: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed Sep 10 18:42:19 2008 +0000
Disable the inline assembly crc32 routine and use the C version instead.
The assembly version is reported to be broken on 5.x+.
PR: kern/100425
Submitted by: Rashid N. Achilov shelton www.granch.ru
MFC after: 1 week
commit 26e46883290bfef867a15fb276b4eb7ee598dce6
Author: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Wed Sep 10 18:36:58 2008 +0000
Resurrect the sbni(4) driver. Someone finally tested the MPSAFE patches and
the driver worked ok with them.
Tested by: friends of yar
commit e9a31041c016f6e2042440c9f18627b7708fc334
Author: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Fri Jul 4 21:06:57 2008 +0000
Remove the sbni(4) driver. No one responded to calls to test it on
current@ and stable@.
--
Gleb Smirnoff