From nobody Mon Sep 13 12:57:50 2021 X-Original-To: chromium@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 350D117C0B50 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4H7RNG0fmXz4rrM for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:57:50 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0DE2788C for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:57:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 18DCvnbu025569 for ; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:57:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 18DCvnZa025568 for chromium@FreeBSD.org; Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:57:49 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: chromium@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 258271] www/chromium: Makefile warning for grep mempcpy /usr/include/string.h. This warning is redundant and persistent. Date: Mon, 13 Sep 2021 12:57:50 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports & Packages X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s) X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People X-Bugzilla-Who: felix@palmen-it.de X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: chromium@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: maintainer-feedback? X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Chromium issues List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-chromium List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-chromium@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D258271 --- Comment #13 from Felix Palmen --- (In reply to Tomoaki AOKI from comment #12) > If swiching to OSVERSION way, and the addition of mempcpy() is planned to= be > MFC'ed to stable/12 and stable/11, this port should be required to updated > again, while (ugly) grep hack doesn't need it. I see the point; in fact, if this change already hit stable/13, my OSVERSION based patch is already wrong :( -- but=E2=80=A6 > I wonder which way would be better for this huge port. I still think it's the better approach cause calling external tools should = be avoided. These things could pile up and kill any make performance. At the v= ery least, make sure to do these calls only when really required to expand the variable in question (which is what my patch does). Of course, just an opinion so far. IMHO, go with the "fixed" grep for now, = but revisit this once OSVERSION bumps refer the change in question. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=