From nobody Fri Sep 12 12:41:54 2025 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4cNYw21Wj6z67Q0M for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R12" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cNYw20rx1z3hlB for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1757680914; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lGeVCyhEVbmW1Gg2auNLXgcKO5DOzPz1JcDyYptMW88=; b=rL1g8WiblmIq+aXhy3kUvcxyTHsRQ9H/IqULH0b5W+HRdKF3owGYFjVeoHDyo/Zqurqp2w E6oT+wGH0m9+y9D/pTLdMfFe3xr3QGabJh2sac9ckh7QhV7zcgvB+DdHaXKNvph9yTjik3 FAsG99aTfv9OKQb5NYCe8X+yjfvyp8MFh41EBTVq+Ox40M91L+VTJ0SVAi4vHGXLRwAzUZ 8EhY2b7xrGfhSLHXFmLZRW00Hhf5if9jJCoSnMhgqzMQZWSFU2AlBoIg4A8mTIqPsdiMEm lUW1the1J0Sjw7HY6bgLG+8pooYqcbOt2l4E80BK+3N4EVPz8Yf7kQdvVmV07A== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1757680914; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=lGeVCyhEVbmW1Gg2auNLXgcKO5DOzPz1JcDyYptMW88=; b=ByDxAUM+1FAG6BFflaxyqp5Zb0OjHAFO7jpxRiRBav2WCqBptPmKdL3SejYQ6bXknH+rwC G+0q+HVXb1T/plntgNGsTQQLx6TWZ0dIF/owV6bbCATnqo+rU74rioFI4jtLX/NXxtI7lE 5Dh0QImlHmWC6Ym2la/YFLPSB4KgMBCQR7dMk7qRdqIAUL7N15eHL85ysR+H08j0F7jA9d 50rb1Sb1MOkJvBGkVD66vb/VnYlY8BgEO8fNBPyYYQAHMMir2/yccVeTPQ97L6z8+Nn3f0 SOFnkdWybytONxPuthqc3eoAVWmYhrxEV9DbLR0Vn/+hhun6nAuHPsXqjDhZWw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1757680914; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=QYjNUADtWjZFvkz9aCYWDYlhHjbXeOB+QV17ajNTCWlj8iw5buEteLSbUkn4lAJ45cvQPJ rvp7ZOa3869RMpTZGnKRE4EY0US4mEwmjaVb7S0jygD7yW0FGyYe6M/7A3bZT09+oH6VsK J4Lz8MlFwghzaEhU2Fh6DlpxJpGa/SDEENScMIFraQGUxBpYBEI90v9MQJvrwrZNbKAODM tgfWX/xGP2A2xyL32OUz4G9KIDyIsrWjWAMfrhJUvHLDkhRbgzUG/PE458YtyJ7WtcVi2F kraB12Y/9RWl9UfDVNEgL8jo59S9zg7X1aI/b/3t7qwZuCWF3Iu7lXmqhbogGA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4cNYw20JmxztXh for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:41:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 58CCfrl4094013 for ; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:41:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 58CCfrO9094012 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:41:53 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 263229] virtio vtnet driver with rxcsum errors Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:41:54 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: mike@sentex.net X-Bugzilla-Status: In Progress X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D263229 --- Comment #30 from mike@sentex.net --- I am fine with closing this PR as the main issue with checksum offloading s= eems fixed. I guess the larger question is should routing performance be impacte= d so significantly. I havent done any tests in a while, but I dont recall if usi= ng em nics in a VM have the same negative impact or not. For my use case, turn= ing off LRO when using a VM as a firewall/router just becomes a tuneable for me= .=20 But I imagine others *might* run into this and not know that needs to be do= ne ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=