[Bug 290140] mdo(1) and mac_do(4) not working on 15ALPHA5
- In reply to: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 290140] mdo(1) and mac_do(4) not working on 15ALPHA5"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 08:57:57 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=290140
Olivier Certner <olce@FreeBSD.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|regression |
Status|New |Closed
Assignee|bugs@FreeBSD.org |olce@FreeBSD.org
Resolution|--- |Works As Intended
--- Comment #4 from Olivier Certner <olce@FreeBSD.org> ---
Hi,
The "new syntax" (well, we are just talking about the ":" => ">" change) works
as the old (and as you noted, ":" is still accepted). Effectively, ">" is a
special character to the shell and you have to quote it. Obviously, this
drawback was considered when changing the separator between the from/to parts
of a rule, but was then deemed a minor inconvenience compared to having a more
readable rule specification (":" is very much associated to path separation in
UNIX, and catches the eye too much IMO, whereas this is not the separator
between rules but just inside rules between parts; and ">" is supposed to evoke
an arrow, helping visualize the authorized transition). The plan was to
deprecate ":" at some point (that's why it was removed from the documentation;
not before 16 in any case), but if people absolutely prefer ":", we can as well
keep it indefinitely.
The "Operation not permitted" you are observing is perfectly normal (and it is
not a regression). As explained in the manual page, if you specify a clause
with type "gid" in the "to" part of a rule, then no default are applied for
groups and you get what you asked for. In your example, only 0 is allowed for
primary groups (real, effective, saved variants) and *no supplementary groups*
are allowed at all. This is not going to work on regular installations, where
'root' is a member of the 'wheel' and 'operator' supplementary groups. So what
you want instead if you want to be very-fine grained is:
sysctl security.mac.do.rules='uid=1001>uid=0,gid=0,+gid=0,+gid=5'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.