[Bug 281796] /bin/ls doesn't print UTF-8 emojis properly in some cases, but /bin/du does
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 281796] /bin/ls doesn't print UTF-8 emojis properly in some cases, but /bin/du does"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 281796] /bin/ls doesn't print UTF-8 emojis properly in some cases, but /bin/du does"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 281796] /bin/ls doesn't print UTF-8 emojis properly in some cases, but /bin/du does"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 281796] /bin/ls doesn't print UTF-8 emojis properly in some cases, but /bin/du does"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 01 Oct 2024 14:03:49 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=281796
Bug ID: 281796
Summary: /bin/ls doesn't print UTF-8 emojis properly in some
cases, but /bin/du does
Product: Base System
Version: 14.1-RELEASE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: bin
Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: henrichhartzer@tuta.io
I had some filenames with emojis on my filesystem and noticed an interesting
behavior.
I noticed that /bin/du will print the filename and size with the emoji, but
/bin/ls prints question marks.
zsh$ du this-has-an-apple-emoji-$'\360'$'\237'$'\215'$'\216'
0 this-has-an-apple-emoji-🍎
zsh$ ls this-has-an-apple-emoji-$'\360'$'\237'$'\215'$'\216'
this-has-an-apple-emoji-????
zsh$ du this-has-an-apple-emoji-$'\360'$'\237'$'\215'$'\216' | hexdump -C
00000000 30 09 74 68 69 73 2d 68 61 73 2d 61 6e 2d 61 70 |0.this-has-an-ap|
00000010 70 6c 65 2d 65 6d 6f 6a 69 2d f0 9f 8d 8e 0a |ple-emoji-.....|
0000001f
zsh$ ls this-has-an-apple-emoji-$'\360'$'\237'$'\215'$'\216' | hexdump -C
00000000 74 68 69 73 2d 68 61 73 2d 61 6e 2d 61 70 70 6c |this-has-an-appl|
00000010 65 2d 65 6d 6f 6a 69 2d f0 9f 8d 8e 0a |e-emoji-.....|
0000001d
Although, I think it's more complicated than that. This is my behavior with
x11/foot, but not with x11/sterm.
This may not be a /bin/ls bug, but seems to be a discrepancy between /bin/ls
and /bin/du.
I can't immediately tell an obvious difference in the hexdump, so I wonder if
there's some kind of terminal signaling going on or not going on that's
changing how it's printed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.