[Bug 275295] Linuxulator: faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 275295] Linuxulator: faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 275295] Linuxulator: faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 275295] Linuxulator: faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2023 08:30:14 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=275295
Bug ID: 275295
Summary: Linuxulator: faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
Product: Base System
Version: 14.0-STABLE
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: kern
Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: kenrap@kennethraplee.com
Recently a weird file permission issue had popped up with using the Brave
browser through the Linuxulator when trying to run it:
/usr/local/bin/linux-brave: /compat/ubuntu/opt/brave.com/brave/brave-wrapper:
Permission denied
The permissions were fine and the problem continued to persist after trying
multiple Ubuntu-lator re-installations, even with different versions, e.g.:
jammy, lunar, mantic.
Eventually I thought to peak into the dmesg output and found the following:
linux: jid 0 pid 63533 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 64609 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 66611 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 75500 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 77301 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 79047 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 85152 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 88585 (grep): syscall splice not really implemented
linux: jid 0 pid 64576 (kbd_mode): linux_ioctl_fallback fd=5, cmd=0x4b33
('K',51) is not implemented
linux: jid 0 pid 64576 (kbd_mode): linux_ioctl_fallback fd=5, cmd=0x4b33
('K',51) is not implemented
linux: jid 0 pid 50603 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 44462 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 44462 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 22 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 4658 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 11089 (setcap): capset[0] effective=0x80000000, permitted=0x0,
inheritable=0x0 is not implemented
linux: jid 0 pid 15094 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 16805 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 18843 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 20469 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 24832 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 84149 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 85600 (systemctl): faccessat2 unsupported flag 0x100
linux: jid 0 pid 98160 (curl): unsupported setsockopt level 6 optname 31
linux: jid 0 pid 16546 (gpg-agent): syscall inotify_init not implemented
With regards to the "(gpg-agent)" line, I would like to note that I've also
been having `apt update` GPG errors in the Ubuntu linuxulation. I've used `deb
[trusted=yes] ...` in /compat/ubuntu/etc/apt/sources.list as a workaround to
get updates but users shouldn't have to do this either.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.