Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 09:05:33 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=271394 --- Comment #4 from Konstantin Belousov <kib@FreeBSD.org> --- Why is NAT-T needed for IPv6? The main (the only ?) promise of IPv6 is to get rid of the NAT. Then, the technique to improve NAT traversal for ipsec might be not too useful. On the other hand, it is a different encapsulation which could have application by itself. Can you please explain your use for NAT-T over IPv6? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.