From nobody Wed Jan 04 19:32:00 2023 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4NnKVT4cp1z2ntHN for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NnKVT3XqGz4L5h for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1672860721; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Jmm/40rvthcyoe9A5Bg7ODyObUsNXP7mQow2R2UFX34=; b=ZgKE5X645J+R2aPnXcAAaVVGfnKggeBNihJxwYTdUUcnuw6m5LrcOoWE/m4Y9KgSl0Qmk7 oImBARe8Nc1sfXxWtVMSAkXs5UxR1IQacdefA29JPbuEmoktvsZkkfNyoJwmMkG1vEqcmn WLTYT7eNHOgKSLwokx871v9cCotRzt39LTiOj3kf8wsD5OKrL2787/XJO/wFHdqaBSrkI/ AyA/mTT236FBDY732MouVHCMk2zWQWbX31zX6467vLIaVhEVz0n0AU86vqlQWIv8m5Uqf9 ziQAKHIO2sHEZBHLtD06aEC2t5sm6cSi8AC4zK899nCoa3OGcK7as5etXmENCg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1672860721; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=OdxR6KxUG6tGcZQS2UImEU2uzZcMtCRU0JqC4bWFOSyduDXYPQ6HuT8pfkQlF2NgB/H+3Q mmtEoHa+9aVZpzPQLnREZlQ5L2OuEZBAN+IFDAEPLtwXoy25al8RRmM+x1uPg4IilQ72XF 7cJw9xYGaqu6ghmmTGRIi8J0dncmr9l8LfUz2qGLaSYMZ/quRKlftonBPD70TfEIGAEZKV cQj2yTJPIKwSq13uyiAFfYAeHFM2sBl9Mi1Mpja7gi30+BCDvpUqLvH0nlrMLh0Qlx+zoW sGg0Nhy8NwoMl8r2quQliNQTylbxZ7HBgnzwicXG2t6mzAuaPxjbbr+Sk3CQWw== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4NnKVT2cTvzN0B for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:32:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 304JW16u008188 for ; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:32:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 304JW16p008187 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 4 Jan 2023 19:32:01 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 267278] ipfw mask addr:mask syntax creates wrong rule Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2023 19:32:00 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: bin X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.1-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: ae@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D267278 --- Comment #6 from Andrey V. Elsukov --- (In reply to Marek Zarychta from comment #5) > My concern is the requirement to set net.inet.ip.fw.one_pass=3D0, but pro= bably > without this setting dummynet and nat64lsn aren't supposed to work togeth= er,=20 > is that right? When you use nat64_direct_output, nat64 module will send translated packet directly and dummynet will be unable to catch it for scheduling. When you use dummynet+onepass, a packet after scheduling will have IPFW_ONE= PASS flag. This means it will be explicitly accepted without passing through firewall rules when you plan it to be translated. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=