[Bug 268717] [pf] rdr rules don't work for traffic originating at localhost

From: <bugzilla-noreply_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2023 13:28:53 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=268717

            Bug ID: 268717
           Summary: [pf] rdr rules don't work for traffic originating at
                    localhost
           Product: Base System
           Version: 13.1-RELEASE
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: kern
          Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: dfr@rabson.org

Created attachment 239212
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=239212&action=edit
Script to setup a test. Run this, then try 'telnet 10.123.0.1 8080'

I am using rules that look like this:

rdr log (all) inet proto tcp from any to ! 10.123.0.2 port = 8080 -> 10.123.0.2
port 80

to allow access to workloads running in jails/containers which is a common
pattern for container runtimes like containerd or podman. Typically, a workload
(e.g. nginx) runs in a container on its usual port and is 'published' to the
host by mapping a host port to the container's address and port. In the example
above, the container is in a vnet jail with address 10.123.0.2 and the
intention is to publish the container's port 80 as the host's port 8080.

This type of rule works well for traffic originating on some other machine with
destination set to the host's IP and port 8080 but when traffic originates on
the host itself, the rule matches but traffic doesn't flow. As far as I can
tell, the pf rule matches outgoing packets (e.g. SYN for new connections) as
being 'received' by lo0 where the packet is rewritten to the container IP/port
and travels to the container. The return packet (e.g. SYN+ACK) is not received
and packet traces show the host rejecting with RST.

My hypothesis is that a state entry is created for the outgoing packet and
registed with lo0 but the reply is received on a different interface (in my
case a bridge) and the reverse translation is not performed.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.