From nobody Fri Feb 17 23:04:59 2023 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PJS886dr9z3rv7B for ; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ed1-x52c.google.com (mail-ed1-x52c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::52c]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1D4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PJS8844gNz4Qh1; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 23:05:12 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from aryeh.friedman@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-ed1-x52c.google.com with SMTP id co2so9420227edb.13; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:05:12 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=we1tXqPos3w7DWbKUlwEXGezeJsEyhiWwa460/jQb30=; b=kedGVikIruQYwqGnWx5x2h/Ld6WNMJSGq07Ku1gX+tGN0TE107pVdlgHDXbSu/F9/j f3CcIWZ3AefEtAawuQ/zsYmcXqhNEV6cP9CJNiGId8/YHOaliXQwNoDZ7yBbWm4VLXbu 4VwwwCZLAmxz8+Vpm6tELaTSaT2YbYKHVxnS9O5s4lNr4wKxafGEbUWquAT0e/o7C9Cr igzGrz/TAu/Ie+Q9kuRjpGEXwAY7EvLaec6PMqdfpNBETwOUnntkm4lQixeBMpEvlqRY Hk05Hz2cQl6u1rgu9Sxd520gk8HGKDdoqAX9u095AIo7GbaaOIkE03emD83t1hPYY8ip Wg1A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=we1tXqPos3w7DWbKUlwEXGezeJsEyhiWwa460/jQb30=; b=tKVeb/e6C1oxjw8h4bl0kpX8gCXet22xnU5GHkxflHx4kseawhY4KhBW2Yf6UBflAC ztsnTODRi2yeFU8FFTLKLANPRn20iYe4rjQPZZ/u5EUM/pTORX2b4DKdO8iTcTckJPi+ sS90rdLeBOCcsH0lHhUMiGIg1qRZTLa+Wcqj72k8ECEhF39Q6lOBb8L/fNbvKHz+U+df hlTRg4zZvg62Pb4vxmSNYyu9OSXYyek10MmoY118Uj02h1AhcgsWrpR3BUNzdj0TSNbB tba2Qgv0sjRaNbNNn7bzRm+LngPDkc2LDvrMOnwUG+NWZrfzHwA9eVY+Y4bFt0QtY6QK rFtQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AO0yUKXssAaxAwBVpKudJJOJK929KwflsnN4018U2YcbwVP2oHv8d/wB Z5NymkBFZGKu2F9ycunqyYMDA9UDadeFeWveAG5u3yXZ X-Google-Smtp-Source: AK7set/MCqpreKxn13s4PHrRpGGVV8XvwBM1tToeLW72df578NxIDPmGk4nOmUoKAJfQrE9rdhLy75A4ouAD6tDUqa4= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:d0cb:b0:8b2:94c1:9e8f with SMTP id bq11-20020a170906d0cb00b008b294c19e8fmr1708248ejb.12.1676675110489; Fri, 17 Feb 2023 15:05:10 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Aryeh Friedman Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2023 18:04:59 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [Bug 269606] black screen after monitor wake up To: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org Cc: bugs@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4PJS8844gNz4Qh1 X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:2a00:1450::/32, country:US]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[] X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I can confirm it also does not work on nVidia cards either.... the only fix I have found is rm -rf ~/.config/xfce4 but that has the obvious downside of having to reconfig it which is 5 to 10 mins. On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 5:34 PM wrote: > > https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=269606 > > --- Comment #6 from Paul Dufresne --- > I just switched to: > paul@dufresnep:/usr/home/paul $ cat > /usr/local/etc/X11/xorg.conf.d/20-intel.conf > Section "Device" > Identifier "Card" > #Driver "vesa" > #Driver "intel" > #Driver "scfb" > # does not exist: Driver "glamor" > Driver "modesetting" > EndSection > paul@dufresnep:/usr/home/paul $ > > And that works fine! > with modesetting, after display sleep, moving the mouse return the full > windows. > > And I believe this is more stable than the intel driver... I did not report > yet, but I had some small line of pixel corruption here and there with intel > driver. > > So I intend to keep that one. > > So the bug seems to be with the X11 intel driver. > > -- > You are receiving this mail because: > You are the assignee for the bug. -- Aryeh M. Friedman, Lead Developer, http://www.PetiteCloud.org