From nobody Sat Apr 15 13:10:57 2023 X-Original-To: bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4PzDGB02Zjz45JVh for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 13:10:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PzDG94kdXz4D73 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 13:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=freebsd.org; s=dkim; t=1681564257; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=C0ONRLJby3ZM1XjjemV47+k4V9GRu+UlPQl+gqEcWfg=; b=UaKiMewbxQo5wi8RV2jXa/sS0Mtqgqv2InQHy9ALcSyFt2k7gxXZd3JgXOFqZg7KnUkT+O iSj2pJZ6PehabGAWCFDTMJkdPn4r4GojnUuuKktFspD/X4+2e3vMiiPrXqI9f9SQTFTj3I rYaQ51WjIZ5QANOiniEORb+wB4IgNTyLqcEThyzVvWYslteGR/jUYtdwcQzWLyqRHykQF1 KtQ4z3G9cCliUJRPtdkrAMOkVtprQgY7v0jXT0BRRUoPmahEesgTOK8sphFVxiUwWK6SYv C138X3g2G38Qp2GtLU6XyjfpeDN+pbzpndV2nm+8pKFNK243Q1TmyRBox+2HRQ== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; mx1.freebsd.org; none ARC-Seal: i=1; s=dkim; d=freebsd.org; t=1681564257; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=KHSpev18VJGbHOuVa3Mm7Cfuea96otDzywZ6Bx+5zgwhRF2lslV6+xl1HekwoR7lWBF4a+ 7gLOuiFkzjHUjMYqyHDSm27a85aMCanZYX68BvLlpTlE5nT9CeE3/VuHPaZrVpJXRF1GO+ MYL067pr+eNBC23JcPTrV6kl5t2x5f1VBK4v5m0QxDSQa15kZeGoGIajaNnLImy2xnZ5/x FVeL7bsUJOGj1j3JgXlnBPH8I6C2rYdBDnUfc01q9DU2pg37ePreWOaLwWCoaO/4s97F+t /Cfj9O1A6Jqm5F+JVhiYOlQkg8Gwhh9CTgJy7T0NJ5QFJgtoCKNtuJYeywtJfA== Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::50:1d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4PzDG93Tnqz16hB for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 13:10:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.5]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 33FDAvrK095671 for ; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 13:10:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id 33FDAvGx095669 for bugs@FreeBSD.org; Sat, 15 Apr 2023 13:10:57 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 260260] igb(4) I35{0,4} parrent <--> vlan jumbo frame mtu mismatch Date: Sat, 15 Apr 2023 13:10:57 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 13.0-STABLE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Only Me X-Bugzilla-Who: zarychtam@plan-b.pwste.edu.pl X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: bugs@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D260260 --- Comment #9 from Marek Zarychta --- It's also worth mentioning, that large UDP datagrams are received fine with= out any workaround, though the frames are shorter, at least in the case of test= ing with iperf3. UDP: 15:00:45.609781 ac:1f:6b:02:aa:bb > ac:1f:6b:02:aa:cc, ethertype IPv4 (0x08= 00), length 9002: (tos 0x0, ttl 64, id 34971, offset 0, flags [none], proto UDP (17), length 8988) 192.168.40.3.49459 > 192.168.40.5.5201: [udp sum ok] UDP, length 8960 TCP: 14:27:36.269125 ac:1f:6b:02:aa:bb > ac:1f:6b:02:aa:cc, ethertype IPv4 (0x0800), length 9014: (tos 0x2,ECT(0), ttl 64, id 0, offset 0, flags [DF], proto TCP (6), length 9000) 192.168.40.3.25218 > 192.168.40.5.5201: Flags [.], cksum 0x1a28 (correc= t), seq 835179525:835188473, ack 1, win 70, options [nop,nop,TS val 2309578650 = ecr 1068877401], length 8948 --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=