[Bug 253445] bectl: does not function in two-level zfs datasets

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=253445

--- Comment #33 from Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Kyle Evans from comment #27)
> bectl should not be trying to mandate what's right or wrong here. As long as the > kernel and userland rc zfs* scripts are working with this setup otherwise out of > the box, I struggle to see why we shouldn't try to accommodate.

I guess that this is a non-technical decision / choice.

My personal approach would be:
- if you want to use a non-conventional layout then you would need to use
something other than bectl to manage it
- if you want to use bectl, then please use the conventional layout

You seem to prefer for bectl to support any BE layout.
As an example, how about BEs that are not siblings?
Is that reasonable too?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.