[Bug 259528] [carp] Backup node becomes second active master when master have some negative demotion values
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 259528] [carp] Backup node becomes second active master when master have some negative demotion values"
- Reply: bugzilla-noreply_a_freebsd.org: "[Bug 259528] [carp] Backup node becomes second active master when master have some negative demotion values"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 29 Oct 2021 12:58:37 UTC
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=259528
Bug ID: 259528
Summary: [carp] Backup node becomes second active master when
master have some negative demotion values
Product: Base System
Version: CURRENT
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: kern
Assignee: bugs@FreeBSD.org
Reporter: marius.halden@modirum.com
Created attachment 229121
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=229121&action=edit
reproduction.sh
Given nodes 1 and 2, where node 1 has an advskew of 0 and node 2 has an advskew
of 100, making them master and backup respectively.
If net.inet.carp.demotion is set to a negative value on node 1, node 2 might
become master while node 1 still retains it master status. Wether or not node 2
becomes master seems to depend on the nodes advskew and what the demotion
sysctl was set to on node 1.
The reason for node 2 becoming master seems to be that the calculated advskew
taking demotion into account is truncated to a single unsigned byte when copied
into the carp header for sending[0], and node 1 stays master since it takes
uses the whole non-truncated calculated advskew when deciding wether to stay
master[1].
To reproduce, make sure carp support is enabled (kernel module loaded or built
in), then run attached reproduction case.
Expected output from reproduction script when setting a negative demotion on
the master:
># sh carp-test.sh
>Staring jail carp1.
>Staring jail carp2.
>
>Waiting for things to settle...
>
>carp1 status: MASTER
>carp2 status: BACKUP
>
>decreasing carp demotion in carp1 jail
>net.inet.carp.demotion: 0 -> -1
>
>Waiting for things to settle...
>
>carp1 status: MASTER
>carp2 status: BACKUP
>
>increasing carp demotion in carp1 jail
>net.inet.carp.demotion: -1 -> 0
>
>Waiting for things to settle...
>
>carp1 status: MASTER
>carp2 status: BACKUP
>
>Cleaning up.
Output actually seen when running the script:
># sh carp-test.sh
>Staring jail carp1.
>Staring jail carp2.
>
>Waiting for things to settle...
>
>carp1 status: MASTER
>carp2 status: BACKUP
>
>decreasing carp demotion in carp1 jail
>net.inet.carp.demotion: 0 -> -1
>
>Waiting for things to settle...
>
>carp1 status: MASTER
>carp2 status: MASTER
>
>increasing carp demotion in carp1 jail
>net.inet.carp.demotion: -1 -> 0
>
>Waiting for things to settle...
>
>carp1 status: MASTER
>carp2 status: BACKUP
>
>Cleaning up.
As shown, both carp nodes become master at the same time.
[0]
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c?id=130aebbab0d38da85f7d32b6d4227f95a2cd9ec7#n931
[1]
https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/netinet/ip_carp.c?id=130aebbab0d38da85f7d32b6d4227f95a2cd9ec7#n736
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.