From nobody Tue May 18 08:39:24 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-bugs@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91FCB3FF65E for ; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FkqDY3lpFz4SGg; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from aniel.nours.eu (ns393929.ip-176-31-115.eu [176.31.115.77]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: bapt) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3F5346B7; Tue, 18 May 2021 08:39:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: by aniel.nours.eu (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 1CDD062CD3; Tue, 18 May 2021 10:39:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 May 2021 10:39:24 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: "Python 37/38 conflict, was Re: Trubles compiling lxqt on RPi4" [really: list interface replacement generates bad textual content] Message-ID: <20210518083924.dt3qdx2rranxff2t@aniel.nours.eu> References: <5deb443a-316f-46b8-ada2-7f66893b5ffa@FreeBSD.org> <8AFC5AD7-8F1F-4980-BB26-62038380946E@yahoo.com> <03DFF722-0473-4306-B1C4-123DBF15B955@yahoo.com> <9B7D4B8B-DD04-4119-8B80-548466D4F063@yahoo.com> <64429369-4010-4c99-888b-3460d9d9141e@FreeBSD.org> <3AF15926-17A0-4577-A673-AC35BE64BA7B@yahoo.com> <212C2CA4-4280-448F-A639-1B7B3E6DE356@yahoo.com> <2365D754-7D28-46C0-B169-9BD5B729DD76@yahoo.com> List-Id: Bug reports List-Archive: http://lists.freebsd.org/bugs List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <2365D754-7D28-46C0-B169-9BD5B729DD76@yahoo.com> On Tue, May 18, 2021 at 12:08:36AM -0700, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-May-18, at 00:03, Mark Millard wrote: > > > > > On 2021-May-17, at 23:55, Mark Millard wrote: > > > >> On 2021-May-17, at 23:37, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>> 18 mai 2021 06:50:03 Mark Millard : > >>> > >>>> On 2021-May-15, at 22:22, Baptiste Daroussin wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> 16 mai 2021 05:29:07 Mark Millard : > >>>>> > >>>>>> In exploring I've seen various web-page presentation of > >>>>>> freebsd-bugs messages that seem to be messed up. An > >>>>>> example is: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> . . . > >>>>> > >>>>> Nice catch, I will fix it > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> The extra text disappeared when I later looked at the > >>>> pages via the URLs. > >>>> > >>>> But I've run into another oddity. I did a google > >>>> search for: > >>>> > >>>> "Comparing the OverDrive 1000 (A57) vs. MACCHIATObin" > >>>> > >>>> and then used the 1st link shown, the one from the text: > >>>> > >>>> QUOTE > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org › freebsd-arm › 2019-December > >>>> Comparing the OverDrive 1000 (A57) vs. MACCHIATObin ... > >>>> Dec 2, 2019 — Comparing the OverDrive 1000 (A57) vs. MACCHIATObin Double Shot (A72) for buildworld and via a CPU/cache/RAM tradeoff-exploring ... > >>>> END QUOTE > >>>> > >>>> which has the link (it is for one of my old messages): > >>>> > >>>> https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=&ved=2ahUKEwiPhp3OtdLwAhVH6Z4KHaXQC68QFjAAegQIAxAD&url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.freebsd.org%2Fpipermail%2Ffreebsd-arm%2F2019-December%2F020854.html&usg=AOvVaw2VHrNUGc-Vce4CjAmTufxq > >>>> > >>>> Or, extracting/converting the relevant part of that text: > >>>> > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2019-December/020854.html > >>>> > >>>> This now takes me to the wrong message on the list, one titled: > >>>> > >>>> Re: 64 bit ARM systems with more than four cores Ed Maste > >>>> > >>>> Turns out that the my old message now shows up as 2 later > >>>> by number (020854 -> 020856): > >>>> > >>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-arm/2019-December/020856.html > >>>> > >>>> gets to the message with the correct title. > >>>> > >>>> It appears that the numbering has not been preserved > >>>> in the conversion. This can make google search results > >>>> that point into the (older) freebsd lists > >>>> problematical. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> === > >>>> Mark Millard > >>>> marklmi at yahoo.com > >>>> ( dsl-only.net went > >>>> away in early 2018-Mar) > >>> > >>> 99.9% of the tume the numbering is preserved, sometimes it is not given the weirdness of the things that happened in the past. i will dig into this specific case to see what I can do. But don t expect much here. > >>> > >> > >> FYI: > >> > >> In my "binary search inspired" looking around everything > >> I looked at that was old but more recent than 2014-Dec-23 > >> had the offset of 2. Everything older than 2014-Dec-10 > >> worked. Those dates are as close together as I got. > >> > >> (Finding things that have useful google search matches in > >> a time frame is messy so the results are limited. It > >> would be nice to find a better way to looking up old > >> references.) > >> > >> Example: > >> > >> "lsof on FreeBSD/arm" goggle search click through to page > >> > >> vs.: > >> > >> Tuesday, 23 December 2014 > >> . . . > >> • Re: lsof on FreeBSD/arm Larry Rosenman > >> • [Differential] [Commented On] D1317: Build gperf as a dependency before gcc for arm releases emaste (Ed Maste) > >> • [Differential] [Updated, 8 lines] D1317: Build gperf as a dependency before gcc for arm releases emaste (Ed Maste) > >> > >> It gets on to the message for last line (still off by two for the > >> number, like what I reported already): > >> > >> By contrast: > >> > >> "watchdogd not working anymore (since r273154+)" google search click through > >> > >> vs.: > >> > >> Wednesday, 10 December 2014 > >> . . . > >> • Re: RPi - watchdogd not working anymore (since r273154+) Andreas Schwarz > >> > >> worked. > > > > A different possible oddity that I just noticed is that > > the old system used UTC dates/times, such as: > > > > Mark Millard marklmi at yahoo.com > > Sat May 1 19:50:18 UTC 2021 > > > > (from freebsd-git). > > > > But the new one uses various time zones (the > > senders time zone?), such as: > > > > From: Mark Millard via freebsd-arm > > Date: Sat, 15 May 2021 14:43:45 -0700 > > > > (from freebsd-arm). > > > > Well . . . > > freebsd-arm's messages have a UTC time after the message, such as: > > Received on Sat May 15 2021 - 21:43:45 UTC > > so both time zones are available. It might be deliberate. After analysis, freebsd-bugs mailing list archives have been edited manually multiple times in the last 18 years, making it impossible to regenerates in a reliable manner archive with compatible URL. This happenned too often to be able to be easily fixed. Best regards, Bapt