Re: WARNING: Unimplemented Standard Service Call:
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: WARNING: Unimplemented Standard Service Call:"
- In reply to: Rebecca Cran : "Re: WARNING: Unimplemented Standard Service Call:"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2025 22:08:51 UTC
On Sat, 21 Jun 2025, Rebecca Cran wrote: > What system? From the message it sounds like the TF-A firmware isn't > implementing a standard service call that should exist. To my very best knowledge I have not seen these WARNINGs in the last two-ish years. Hence me asking what changed on FreeBSD that they do show up now and if we need to do some things connditionally on flags or otherwise? Or, given the thought came, if we do now rely on a specific minimum and that needs to be documented/enforced. > With some systems you can build the TF-A firmware yourself, but others it's > provided as a binary you include as part of the UEFI build when producing a > SPI-NOR image. Yeah, this is a u-boot system and I do have access to the TF-A sources from a public repo but rebasing them will be challenging I bet. I believe they are based on v1.5 and then updated by manufacturer for years and provided to vendor who put further fixes on top for various memory issues for the SoC. This system of (Linux) embedded people is so unsustainable. I am tired of having to do firmware updates and builds for almost every SoC that goes through my hands these days *sigh*. I assume I'll have to bite the bullet but I really would love to understand which chnages on FreeBSD started triggering the WARNINGs. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7