Re: ALPHA1 on Raspberry Pi 3B+ [added: and RPi4B]
- Reply: Emmanuel Vadot : "Re: ALPHA1 on Raspberry Pi 3B+ [added: and RPi4B]"
- In reply to: Mike Karels : "Re: ALPHA1 on Raspberry Pi 3B+ [added: and RPi4B]"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2023 18:44:13 UTC
can’t we OF_setprop some bogus string in the compatible property after the first failure so it won’t come back at every bus scan
> On 14 Aug 2023, at 20:44, Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote:
>
> On 14 Aug 2023, at 11:19, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 10:55:39 -0500
>> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote:
>>
>>> On 14 Aug 2023, at 10:44, titus wrote:
>>>
>>>> + if (OF_hasprop(ofw_bus_get_node(dev), "clock-frequency") == 0) {
>>>> + device_printf(dev, "clock-fixed have no clock-frequency\n");
>>>> + return (ENXIO);
>>>> + }
>>>> this runs before compat_data is checked so will print it for any device clock or not
>>
>> Meh, that's why I should do code at 7am :)
>>
>>> Good point! Shuffling a bit to check both, I see 58 occurrences
>>> of the message. That's better than the 50+ 3-line sequences before.
>>>
>>> Mike
>>
>> Is that more or less than the previous message ? If it's the same
>> there is no point to commit this.
>
> It's the same number of occurrences, but before there were 3 lines per
> occurrence. Now it's 1, and it's more clear what it means. I'd say
> it's worth it.
>
> Mike
>
>>>>> On Aug 14, 2023, at 6:07 PM, Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 09:51:27 -0500
>>>>> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 14 Aug 2023, at 0:30, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Mon, 14 Aug 2023 07:03:19 +0200
>>>>>>> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 12:35:31 -0500
>>>>>>>> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 13 Aug 2023, at 12:19, Emmanuel Vadot wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 13 Aug 2023 11:25:25 -0500
>>>>>>>>>> Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 13 Aug 2023, at 11:10, Mark Millard wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Aug 13, 2023, at 08:17, Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Manu just updated Linux DTS in the tree. Maybe see if you revert that if the problem persists.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> git: 69f8cc60aa1e - main - ofw_firmware: Only match if there is no compatible
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> is the fix that Manu has committed:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> QUOTE
>>>>>>>>>>>> ofw_firmware: Only match if there is no compatible
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If there is a compatible string it likely means that the firmware needs
>>>>>>>>>>>> a dedicated driver (like on RPI*).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> PR: 273087
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tested-by: Mark Millard <marklmi26-fbsd@yahoo.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sponsored by: Beckhoff Automation GmbH & Co. KG
>>>>>>>>>>>> Fixes: fdfd3a90b6ce ("ofw: Add a ofw_firmware driver")
>>>>>>>>>>>> END QUOTE
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Just for completeness: that change fixes the bcm2835_cpufreq0/powerd
>>>>>>>>>>> problem and the gpioled0 problem, but not the clk_fixed2 problem
>>>>>>>>>>> (clk_fixed4 on rpi4). Installing an msdos boot partition from the
>>>>>>>>>>> 3 Aug image makes that problem disappear.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> There is two fixed-clock in the DTB without clock-frequency property
>>>>>>>>>> and with a status set to "disabled", this isn't conforming to the
>>>>>>>>>> bindings
>>>>>>>>>> (https://cgit.freebsd.org/src/tree/sys/contrib/device-tree/Bindings/clock/fixed-clock.yaml)
>>>>>>>>>> so we complain on this, this is normal.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would it be possible to detect the disabled status to prevent the errors
>>>>>>>>> (I'm guessing not) or to suppress the repeats? 150 lines of errors seems
>>>>>>>>> like a lot for an out-of-spec DTB entry, and makes it hard to ignore.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Detecting the disabled status makes no sense, a fixed clock cannot be
>>>>>>>> disable, it's always present and running.
>>>>>>>> But I think that if we check that clock-frenquency isn't present in
>>>>>>>> the probe function, print a message and bail we will not attempt to
>>>>>>>> attach the driver at each pass.
>>>>>>>> That's the only clean solution that I can see without making dirty
>>>>>>>> hacks for some non-conforming DTB.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Something like this :
>>>>>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~manu/0001-clk-fixed-Bail-early-if-there-is-no-clock-frequency-.patch
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let me know if that works.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Not exactly. This results in:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> clk_fixed4: clock-fixed have no clock-frequency
>>>>>>
>>>>>> but this appears 1562 times. btw, "have" should be "has".
>>>>>
>>>>> Then I don't know how to fix this properly.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I hadn't noticed them before, but there are a lock order reversal
>>>>>> and a malloc while holding a non-sleepable lock, associated with
>>>>>> the gpio fix:
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you sure that they are new ?
>>>>>
>>>>>> gpioled0: <GPIO LEDs> on ofwbus0
>>>>>> lock order reversal: (sleepable after non-sleepable)
>>>>>> 1st 0xffff000000d0f6f8 LED mtx (LED mtx, sleep mutex) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298
>>>>>> 2nd 0xffffa00001857c10 Raspberry Pi firmware gpio (Raspberry Pi firmware gpio, sx) @ /usr/src/sys/arm/broadcom/bcm2835/raspberrypi_gpio.c:252
>>>>>> lock order LED mtx -> Raspberry Pi firmware gpio attempted at:
>>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3984 at witness_checkorder+0xa98
>>>>>> #1 0xffff00000046ecb4 at _sx_xlock+0x7c
>>>>>> #2 0xffff0000008b1700 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xe0
>>>>>> #3 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158
>>>>>> #4 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290
>>>>>> #5 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8
>>>>>> #6 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c
>>>>>> #7 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc
>>>>>> #8 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #9 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #10 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c
>>>>>> #11 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc
>>>>>> #12 0xffff0000000008ac at virtdone+0x70
>>>>>> uma_zalloc_debug: zone "malloc-64" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
>>>>>> exclusive sleep mutex LED mtx (LED mtx) r = 0 (0xffff000000d0f6f8) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298
>>>>>> stack backtrace:
>>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3dc8 at witness_debugger+0x5c
>>>>>> #1 0xffff0000004d4fcc at witness_warn+0x400
>>>>>> #2 0xffff0000007830a0 at uma_zalloc_debug+0x30
>>>>>> #3 0xffff000000782c20 at uma_zalloc_arg+0x2c
>>>>>> #4 0xffff000000437abc at malloc+0x8c
>>>>>> #5 0xffff0000008a69b4 at bcm2835_firmware_property+0x44
>>>>>> #6 0xffff0000008b1718 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xf8
>>>>>> #7 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158
>>>>>> #8 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290
>>>>>> #9 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8
>>>>>> #10 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c
>>>>>> #11 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc
>>>>>> #12 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #13 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #14 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c
>>>>>> #15 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc
>>>>>> #16 0xffff0000000008ac at virtdone+0x70
>>>>>> uma_zalloc_debug: zone "malloc-16" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
>>>>>> exclusive sleep mutex LED mtx (LED mtx) r = 0 (0xffff000000d0f6f8) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298
>>>>>> stack backtrace:
>>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3dc8 at witness_debugger+0x5c
>>>>>> #1 0xffff0000004d4fcc at witness_warn+0x400
>>>>>> #2 0xffff0000007830a0 at uma_zalloc_debug+0x30
>>>>>> #3 0xffff000000782c20 at uma_zalloc_arg+0x2c
>>>>>> #4 0xffff000000437abc at malloc+0x8c
>>>>>> #5 0xffff0000007ce15c at bounce_bus_dmamem_alloc+0x50
>>>>>> #6 0xffff0000008a9404 at bcm2835_mbox_property+0xdc
>>>>>> #7 0xffff0000008a69e8 at bcm2835_firmware_property+0x78
>>>>>> #8 0xffff0000008b1718 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xf8
>>>>>> #9 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158
>>>>>> #10 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290
>>>>>> #11 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8
>>>>>> #12 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c
>>>>>> #13 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc
>>>>>> #14 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #15 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #16 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c
>>>>>> #17 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc
>>>>>> uma_zalloc_debug: zone "malloc-128" with the following non-sleepable locks held:
>>>>>> exclusive sleep mutex LED mtx (LED mtx) r = 0 (0xffff000000d0f6f8) locked @ /usr/src/sys/dev/led/led.c:298
>>>>>> stack backtrace:
>>>>>> #0 0xffff0000004d3dc8 at witness_debugger+0x5c
>>>>>> #1 0xffff0000004d4fcc at witness_warn+0x400
>>>>>> #2 0xffff0000007830a0 at uma_zalloc_debug+0x30
>>>>>> #3 0xffff000000782c20 at uma_zalloc_arg+0x2c
>>>>>> #4 0xffff000000437abc at malloc+0x8c
>>>>>> #5 0xffff0000007ce1ac at bounce_bus_dmamem_alloc+0xa0
>>>>>> #6 0xffff0000008a9404 at bcm2835_mbox_property+0xdc
>>>>>> #7 0xffff0000008a69e8 at bcm2835_firmware_property+0x78
>>>>>> #8 0xffff0000008b1718 at rpi_fw_gpio_pin_set+0xf8
>>>>>> #9 0xffff0000001c7400 at led_create_state+0x158
>>>>>> #10 0xffff0000001910d4 at gpioled_attach+0x290
>>>>>> #11 0xffff00000049efa4 at device_attach+0x3f8
>>>>>> #12 0xffff00000049eb14 at device_probe_and_attach+0x7c
>>>>>> #13 0xffff0000004a0e54 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xfc
>>>>>> #14 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #15 0xffff0000004a0e04 at bus_generic_new_pass+0xac
>>>>>> #16 0xffff00000049bd30 at bus_set_pass+0x4c
>>>>>> #17 0xffff0000003ea3bc at mi_startup+0x1fc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Mike
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>
>>>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Emmanuel Vadot <manu@bidouilliste.com> <manu@freebsd.org>