From nobody Sun Aug 07 21:51:02 2022 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4M1ChQ0KHyz4XtHG; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 21:51:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rj@cyclaero.com) Received: from mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de (mo4-p01-ob.smtp.rzone.de [85.215.255.54]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "*.smtp.rzone.de", Issuer "TeleSec ServerPass Class 2 CA" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4M1ChP3t5pz3XQt; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 21:51:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd-rj@cyclaero.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; t=1659909068; s=strato-dkim-0002; d=cyclaero.com; h=To:References:Message-Id:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:From:Subject:Cc:Date: From:Subject:Sender; bh=+ehPSXnZIpzdU5rTlkPFHwuIMSGCcb9VZXQe16DIkl0=; b=nUbSmM476DPGagoTIk26XBHdUAF2RvRi32Twx//aITXOD/KEFuLYViLJG2seDqfAlh fuXcYOjK3LmH0PNiYyC8D7xkbnMSHlRcvWLMUamDFdcLrMu0HDlziJQZdsYkikJMByd/ a5ZNbkn1B/PKjZY6GaNTlosm8/Fa2lutTiU0AxPO8o4Y1TdjUW4zmERvtif/aDvvwMV/ jZnZ0NJF0HsM4fmik1hlgzWsrMttUkQpcel30Au1KYDVjIaBYGFOtWYDbbwIm3eFKeUY ZTEt9Cx8YdT9RSu+Kls9uwRzkhvECRQkSxHSwgKcHgc4K3lfOFAvZXRqDVhPznIJVDnQ VYkg== X-RZG-AUTH: ":O2kGeEG7b/pS1F2rRHW2isrKl4DV03XBEi+I6ZuztdvN9wS3wFGySS4Lw+ldTBio08NTPnK5bNCibgxfnBg=" X-RZG-CLASS-ID: mo00 Received: from mail.obsigna.com by smtp.strato.de (RZmta 47.47.0 AUTH) with ESMTPSA id q0201fy77Lp8tci (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate); Sun, 7 Aug 2022 23:51:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from rolf-mini.obsigna.com (unknown [177.189.198.217]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.obsigna.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2E72C63AAD; Sun, 7 Aug 2022 23:51:05 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 12.4 \(3445.104.15\)) Subject: Re: Looks like the arm 20220805 snapshots are still odd, so probably kern.geom.part.mbr.enforce_chs=0 was still in use From: "Dr. Rolf Jansen" In-Reply-To: <6AF28022-A8E7-46B3-B64E-99D217E9B6AC@yahoo.com> Date: Sun, 7 Aug 2022 18:51:02 -0300 Cc: Glen Barber , Warner Losh , "Rodney W. Grimes" , Ed Maste , FreeBSD Hackers , Mark Millard Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <99DC4046-AB8D-4D10-9475-94A8DC89DCFA@cyclaero.com> References: <6AF28022-A8E7-46B3-B64E-99D217E9B6AC@yahoo.com> To: freebsd-arm X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.104.15) X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4M1ChP3t5pz3XQt X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N > Am 07.08.2022 um 16:50 schrieb Mark Millard : >=20 > On 2022-Aug-7, at 12:32, Glen Barber wrote: >=20 >> Correct, it was set to =E2=80=9C0=E2=80=9D for these builds. >>=20 >> I honestly do not have any idea where the problems you are seeing are = creeping in. >>=20 >> Should it be set back to =E2=80=9C1=E2=80=9D? I=E2=80=99m not sure = how to proceed otherwise. >=20 > My guess is that if the release/tools/arm.subr line: >=20 > chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -a 64k = ${mddev}s2 >=20 > was instead (note the added -b use): >=20 > chroot ${CHROOTDIR} gpart add -t freebsd-ufs -b 64k -a = 64k ${mddev}s2 >=20 > then the line: >=20 > chroot ${CHROOTDIR} newfs -U -L rootfs /dev/${mddev}s2a >=20 > would work as expected and things would still be aligned: > no aliasing of BSD vs. freebsd-ufs. (In part this is by > prior steps already having achieved alignment of BSD.) =46rom a strict mathematical stand point of view, -a is not necessary = when using -b with an aligned value. Personally I don=E2=80=99t use the -a option of gpart anymore since it = started to do funny magics in front of face. If I remember correct, = gpart of the FreeBSD 9.x-RELEASES was still OK (or was it 8?). Nowadays, = I align all my storage media by employing -b with a reasonable value. Best regards Rolf=