From nobody Mon Jun 21 07:10:46 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B002111D3B95 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mafsys1234@gmail.com) Received: from mail-pl1-x62e.google.com (mail-pl1-x62e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62e]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G7gfg49ZBz4Y0m for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 07:10:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from mafsys1234@gmail.com) Received: by mail-pl1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id 69so8027228plc.5 for ; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 00:10:51 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding:content-language; bh=XvNgEv7rzir0L6LKtPKpicy7T0cBtEm5YmhyYwJSOG0=; b=UH8Z1bg2pe8q0jKAaMdkU160MKsaBdS+ctERWGYtV/XqpAIr6WwLUkyIh4hGJ0QcHz xAD5YxHiCKQBKdR1ZiKcCCpkM61BsfrRbQDYQsx2I0uyYMPMQKPEMVuNSfCc/LNBxRYf RFAKsk2R/kJCfXY8ujogyhLcgOJCrGlYXdu63hPzhfo3hfTyuJh+RrejclYmtyXIIU4l gLmtxdf2rqMdhchrwMHWJ5v0CXDyx2QdhUefbWFj/J7pIpGv7j8glS3neCpAiZLNPsoa wTV/UbyWqNptFn5ryvdY1yJq8fmlnaGttIStCvNSpXpJgUpEv1zvWH65w/Da/RreZRbb 5AcQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=XvNgEv7rzir0L6LKtPKpicy7T0cBtEm5YmhyYwJSOG0=; b=oIsJjZ1xJ+cRAcbJWHUsyyMI2ugxwYI73WiTOUCvISjO6NK/pMo8GwlnWML8FbTWJ2 DkOC41f+Z0Jf+/qPoD+7f3SVyGQFv6BldaV8/6znqgsoZsnsAZu+XgG4hOq4QFbF1Ifv IgTa2LtlGRnZjEAuKy7vr3qZx6+w0CRmBHTqW058AXIFbDfcx7q9jgt8JBOXx+npZ5sP QEGvl0huEOvugYB3HrXtytlIvE/p630br/pWgoxhbGZut3gbXqsUL/r7W32mjW+LXSKg xE9jnEL8vFc1DMTECVazragxWKoLvIM2gxkyXw5z608GAPAfqMX444jvblmh8UFM9n8W EmdA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Nco+iNtFLjn7m1chi0GYEgmssqIFoLPC9A5TJBlLP9Kqec5Ge 1atHOzHzMe9i2L1B9PydPkIMyLA7998Dbg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzf784VR0H/NwjZTo2ImQTDOZ4Sk2zQTwVjL7845s21E8ijL3kLmkyPalx9UUhjDu8upSy44g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:de16:: with SMTP id m22mr35491588pjv.60.1624259449986; Mon, 21 Jun 2021 00:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.10] ([115.69.53.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id h11sm15605998pgq.68.2021.06.21.00.10.48 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Jun 2021 00:10:49 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: Raspberry Pi 3B and pitiful network speeds To: Mark Millard Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org References: <20210620144513.1f91a68f@basepc> <169baf0b-3f3c-f1dc-4a6f-b8a0ef863f51@denninger.net> <20210620154105.0c83bbcc@basepc> <20210620222922.51da1818@basepc> <3fa3f2a6-8560-f413-b2eb-5c172ce025eb@gmail.com> <6B4F2FB6-ABA1-4CFA-BE2A-6A466C30FF02@yahoo.com> From: MJ Message-ID: <9c4a283f-a3de-5d3d-a124-ca68bbf01d07@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2021 17:10:46 +1000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.1 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-AU X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4G7gfg49ZBz4Y0m X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 21/06/2021 5:01 pm, Mark Millard wrote: > On 2021-Jun-20, at 23:26, MJ wrote: > >> On 21/06/2021 1:04 pm, Mark Millard wrote: >>> On 2021-Jun-20, at 19:16, MJ wrote: >>> >>> >>>> On 21/06/2021 7:29 am, Denis Ovsienko wrote: >>>>> . . . >>>>> As a separate note, in my setup ifconfig tells "100baseTX >>>>> ", which is expected for RPI3B. In the original message it >>>>> tells "1000baseT ", which means the board is RPI3B+ or >>>> Hi Denis. >>>> >>>> Yes, you're correct. This is the 3B+. I apologize for misrepresenting it. It is also the earlier version board, >>>> >>>> Built in 2017. I think it's version 1.1 (it's in a case, I don't feel like dismantling it). >>> I do not have access to such for any testing, just a 3B. (Not >>> a reasonable comparison.) In checking on that, I ran into the >>> following information: >>> >>> https://www.raspberrypi.org/documentation/hardware/raspberrypi/revision-codes/README.md >>> only shows one revision for 3B+: >>> >>> Code Model Revision RAM Manufacturer >>> . . . >>> a020d3 3B+ 1.3 1GB Sony UK >>> . . . >>> >>> Under RaspiOS the revision code shows up via: cat /proc/cpuinfo >> >> Output of /proc/cpuinfo >> >> cat /proc/cpuinfo >> processor : 0 >> BogoMIPS : 38.40 >> Features : fp asimd evtstrm crc32 cpuid >> CPU implementer : 0x41 >> CPU architecture: 8 >> CPU variant : 0x0 >> CPU part : 0xd03 >> CPU revision : 4 >> >> processor : 1 >> BogoMIPS : 38.40 >> Features : fp asimd evtstrm crc32 cpuid >> CPU implementer : 0x41 >> CPU architecture: 8 >> CPU variant : 0x0 >> CPU part : 0xd03 >> CPU revision : 4 >> >> processor : 2 >> BogoMIPS : 38.40 >> Features : fp asimd evtstrm crc32 cpuid >> CPU implementer : 0x41 >> CPU architecture: 8 >> CPU variant : 0x0 >> CPU part : 0xd03 >> CPU revision : 4 >> >> processor : 3 >> BogoMIPS : 38.40 >> Features : fp asimd evtstrm crc32 cpuid >> CPU implementer : 0x41 >> CPU architecture: 8 >> CPU variant : 0x0 >> CPU part : 0xd03 >> CPU revision : 4 > My guess is that was not a RaspiOS version > but some other Linux. That's correct, it's Devuan (a debian non-systemd derivative). I've never used raspbian (I don't like systemd). Devuan (from Ascii to Beowulf - they're the versions) has been what it's running the last 4 years. I decided to attempt a migration to FreeBSD but given the awful network speeds, that's probably not feasible. That's why I am here :0( > # vcgencmd otp_dump | grep 30: > > should work to find the revision code. But > it failed to initialize on Fedora 34. Definitely not available. I believe this is a raspbian-only thing? Thanks for your input Matt.