From nobody Mon Jul 05 01:58:53 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-arm@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D36911D20F9 for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2021 01:59:02 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) Received: from out03.mta.xmission.com (out03.mta.xmission.com [166.70.13.233]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4GJ84P1NCtz3Gtx for ; Mon, 5 Jul 2021 01:59:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rebecca@bsdio.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=simple/simple; d=bsdio.com; s=xmission; h=Subject:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version: Date:Message-ID:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=A8VzhFPfNpWOT3w3gLqIICkadrMpwiMfy7Epkr2IBfI=; b=edrdXDjUhdYfdQCd7T6EMYvf7s AtFt0tje8vriBzqiWrT/s4KANtXjjVpOnfsIPPCXuIXSqYjefMbgSkW0kL/ciWDR5CG3J/kMkj/8U 9RuL0MGCspRTnnkBoGeiCQPyov87MddW+EflDm+F/yeOxwvUL+2Dtp5uptJMXNhRLdEM=; Received: from in02.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.52]:58988) by out03.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Dsx-00AS7S-2V for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 19:58:59 -0600 Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([166.70.13.68]:37698) by in02.mta.xmission.com with esmtps (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.93) (envelope-from ) id 1m0Dsw-001aLJ-A6 for freebsd-arm@freebsd.org; Sun, 04 Jul 2021 19:58:58 -0600 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A3D1500A9A for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 19:58:58 -0600 (MDT) X-Amavis-Modified: Mail body modified (using disclaimer) - mta4.zcs.xmission.com Received: from mta4.zcs.xmission.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mta4.zcs.xmission.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id mJmXEamgb_w7 for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 19:58:57 -0600 (MDT) Received: from photon.int.bsdio.com (c-174-52-16-57.hsd1.ut.comcast.net [174.52.16.57]) by mta4.zcs.xmission.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 410DC5008FB for ; Sun, 4 Jul 2021 19:58:53 -0600 (MDT) From: Rebecca Cran To: freebsd-arm Message-ID: <8c35aeb8-4367-9168-017a-406c494f22c2@bsdio.com> Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2021 19:58:53 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to ARM processors List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arm List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-arm@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-XM-SPF: eid=1m0Dsw-001aLJ-A6;;;mid=<8c35aeb8-4367-9168-017a-406c494f22c2@bsdio.com>;;;hst=in02.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=166.70.13.68;;;frm=rebecca@bsdio.com;;;spf=none X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 166.70.13.68 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on sa06.xmission.com X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.2 required=8.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,BAYES_50, DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE autolearn=disabled version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% * [score: 0.5717] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=2 Fuz1=2] [Fuz2=2] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa06 1397; IP=ok Body=2 Fuz1=2 Fuz2=2 X-Spam-Combo: ;freebsd-arm X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 272 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.04 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 12 (4.2%), b_tie_ro: 10 (3.7%), parse: 1.07 (0.4%), extract_message_metadata: 4.5 (1.6%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.37 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 3.1 (1.2%), tests_pri_-950: 1.27 (0.5%), tests_pri_-900: 1.02 (0.4%), tests_pri_-90: 112 (41.1%), check_bayes: 110 (40.5%), b_tokenize: 4.0 (1.5%), b_tok_get_all: 3.3 (1.2%), b_comp_prob: 1.64 (0.6%), b_tok_touch_all: 98 (36.1%), b_finish: 0.87 (0.3%), tests_pri_0: 123 (45.1%), check_dkim_signature: 0.48 (0.2%), check_dkim_adsp: 8 (2.9%), poll_dns_idle: 0.96 (0.4%), tests_pri_10: 3.1 (1.1%), tests_pri_500: 9 (3.3%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Anyone working on ACPI fan control for the Honeycomb? X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Sat, 08 Feb 2020 21:53:50 +0000) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in02.mta.xmission.com) X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4GJ84P1NCtz3Gtx X-Spamd-Bar: - Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=bsdio.com header.s=xmission header.b=edrdXDjU; dmarc=none; spf=none (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of rebecca@bsdio.com has no SPF policy when checking 166.70.13.233) smtp.mailfrom=rebecca@bsdio.com X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-1.99 / 15.00]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[bsdio.com:+]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.98)[-0.982]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[174.52.16.57:received]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; RBL_DBL_DONT_QUERY_IPS(0.00)[166.70.13.233:from]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:6315, ipnet:166.70.0.0/16, country:US]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.62)[-0.622]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[bsdio.com:s=xmission]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.99)[-0.987]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-arm@freebsd.org]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[bsdio.com]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; SPAMHAUS_ZRD(0.00)[166.70.13.233:from:127.0.2.255]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[166.70.13.233:from]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[no SPF record]; MAILMAN_DEST(0.00)[freebsd-arm] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N I was wondering if anyone's working on ACPI fan control for the SolidRun Honeycomb? Under FreeBSD, the fan remains obnoxiously loud, and it's annoying enough that if nobody else is working on it I might tackle implementing support for spinning them down. -- Rebecca Cran