Re: Future of armv7
- In reply to: John Baldwin : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2025 20:43:41 UTC
On Wed, 19 Nov 2025 12:53:33 -0500 John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > On 11/17/25 12:57, Vadim Goncharov wrote: > > On Mon, 17 Nov 2025 12:08:29 -0500 > > John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > > >> On 11/15/25 14:14, void wrote: > >>> On Sat, Nov 15, 2025 at 11:44:42AM -0700, Warner Losh wrote: > >>> > >>>> Community surveys, show of hands at conferences, mailing list traffic > >>>> and armv7 package downloads (this is second hand). > >>> > >>> Hmm. OK. But you'd never have counted my usage for example, and I > >>> use 3x rpi2b's. > >>> > >>> I've never seen a survey about this and I've never attended a > >>> conference. Much of the time if there's an issue I'd > >>> search first before posting on freebsd-arm@. > >>> I think it's reasonable to assume I'm not alone in this. > >> > >> There is an annual user survey broadcast to announce@, etc. Please > >> do fill it out the next time it is offered. The last survey was posted > >> in April of 2025, so I expect the next one to be around the same > >> timeframe in 2026. > > > > Many FreeBSD users are not subscribed and do not fill surveys. Seems that > > it should be some more aggressive stats gathering, e.g. enabled by default > > periodic scripts transmitting anonimized usage (this could be done even via > > things like modifying URL for pkg's vuln.xml fetching), questions in the > > installer, and/or other things. > > No, our users generally do not want boxes to call back "home", certainly not > by default. This should be re-checked. For example via survey :) > We do already have some stats on which package files are > downloaded. As discussion shows, this is not reliable at all. URLs in periodic have at least somewhat more reliable. -- WBR, @nuclight