Future of armv7
- Reply: Robert Clausecker : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: Kristof Provost : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: Adrian Chadd : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: void : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: Bjoern A. Zeeb: "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: Ruslan Bukin: "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: Christopher Bowman : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: Tomek CEDRO : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Reply: Minsoo Choo : "Re: Future of armv7"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2025 17:09:07 UTC
Two and a half years ago when we first began talking about deprecating 32-bit architectures in 15.0, we decided to keep armv7 for at least the stable/15 branch but did not commit to anything beyond that. Now that 15.0 is close to shipping and we are turning our development focus to 16.0, we should figure out what we want to say about armv7 for 16.x in the 15.0 release notes so that users have suitable notice. In particular, do we want to deprecate armv7 in 16.0 (similar to the state of 32-bit powerpc in 15.0), or do we want to keep it? My initial suggestion is that we announce that we plan to deprecate it in 16.0. In that case, I would also suggest that we follow a similar process of keeping armv7 for most of the lifetime of 16.0 so that we can reneg if need be during the 16.0 cycle. What do other folks think? -- John Baldwin