Re: Kqueues and fork
- Reply: Konstantin Belousov : "Re: Kqueues and fork"
- In reply to: Konstantin Belousov : "Re: Kqueues and fork"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 14:59:17 UTC
On 8/21/25 03:45, Konstantin Belousov wrote: > Process notes should be easier, there mostly the pids need fixing. This note jumped out at me (and EVFILT_PROC is one of the filters I think has the potential to not be straightfoward with fork()). What cases do you envision rewriting PIDs? It's not clear to me that there are obvious cases (other than perhaps self-referential) where the child wants the PID to change. I can even imagine cases where an application might not want self-referential filters to change (e.g. a forking daemon might in the presence of forking kqueues register an EVFILT_PROC on its own pid in the parent as part of a "template" kqueue so that all children will get an event if the main parent process dies). -- John Baldwin