Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)
- Reply: Kyle Evans : "Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)"
- Reply: Warner Losh : "Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)"
- Reply: Mark Millard : "Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)"
- Reply: Robert Clausecker : "Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)"
- In reply to: Mark Millard : "Re: Future of 32-bit platforms (including i386)"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Fri, 04 Aug 2023 04:34:17 UTC
On 8/3/23 2:36 PM, Mark Millard wrote: > John Baldwin <jhb_at_FreeBSD.org> wrote on > Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2023 19:57:08 UTC : > >> On 7/27/23 10:49 AM, shurd@FreeBSD.org wrote: >>> On 2023-05-24 01:35, Emmanuel Vadot wrote: >>>> On Tue, 23 May 2023 16:46:51 -0700 >>>> John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/27/23 10:19 AM, John Baldwin wrote: >>>>>> . . . >> >> It's not just about make tinderbox, it is also about keeping platforms >> viable. One big example is that we probably need to start supporting the >> use of rust in the base system in some form in the not too distant >> future, but rust isn't supported on armv7 on FreeBSD (and someone would >> need to do the work to make that happen). > > I'm confused about the "isn't supported on armv7 on FreeBSD" > claim: Please see https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=254853 as an example. According to that bug at least rustc is not doable under qemu-user which is how armv7 packages are built. -- John Baldwin