Re: enabling float128 support in clang?
- Reply: Brooks Davis : "Re: enabling float128 support in clang?"
- In reply to: Brooks Davis : "enabling float128 support in clang?"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 15:02:05 UTC
On Mon, 3 Oct 2022 at 19:43, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> TL;DR: Is there a reason not to enable float128 support in clang for
> x86?
>
> Due to a build breakage with the flang runtime, I recently noticed that
> unlike most other OSes we don't support float128 in clang. It's enable
> in modern GCC and other OSes have it enable in clang:
> - Hakiu 2018: https://reviews.llvm.org/D54901
> - Solaris 2018: https://reviews.llvm.org/D41240
> - WASM 2019: https://reviews.llvm.org/D57154
> - Dragonfly 2021: https://reviews.llvm.org/D111760
> - OpenBSD (history hard to find...)
>
> Is there a known reason not to enable this?
>
> Patch to enable below (I'm a bit skeptical of the __FLOAT128__ part as
> GCC doesn't define it...)
>
> -- Brooks
>
> diff --git a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/OSTargets.h b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/OSTargets.h
> index c75f7d9fbafe..ea95f40e81a0 100644
> --- a/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/OSTargets.h
> +++ b/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/OSTargets.h
> @@ -232,6 +232,9 @@ protected:
> // setting this to 1 is conforming even if all the basic source
> // character literals have the same encoding as char and wchar_t.
> Builder.defineMacro("__STDC_MB_MIGHT_NEQ_WC__", "1");
> +
> + if (this->HasFloat128)
> + Builder.defineMacro("__FLOAT128__");
> }
>
> public:
> @@ -241,6 +244,7 @@ public:
> default:
> case llvm::Triple::x86:
> case llvm::Triple::x86_64:
> + this->HasFloat128 = true;
> this->MCountName = ".mcount";
> break;
> case llvm::Triple::mips:
>
I think this makes sense and may even motivate me to try and get the
necessary library calls merged to compiler-rt
(https://reviews.llvm.org/D98261).
One thing to note is that your current patch will also enable float128
for AArch64 (and other targets), which I don't believe any other OS
does.
I think it makes sense to restrict it to just x86 to avoid executing
code in the compiler that has not been well tested. I believe for all
other supported architectures long double is the same as float128 so
it probably doesn't make too much sense to enable it there anyway.
Alex