Re: git: a6d57f312f18 - main - nfsd: Fix handling of hidden/system during Open/Create
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2026 23:47:09 UTC
On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 3:42 PM Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu> wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 09, 2026 at 03:04:33PM -0800, Rick Macklem wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 9, 2026 at 11:56 AM Benjamin Kaduk <bjkfbsd@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 8, 2026 at 4:33 PM Rick Macklem <rmacklem@freebsd.org> wrote: > > >> > > >> The branch main has been updated by rmacklem: > > >> > > >> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=a6d57f312f18bbeeda8a34e99d0a662b0db9a190 > > >> > > >> commit a6d57f312f18bbeeda8a34e99d0a662b0db9a190 > > >> Author: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org> > > >> AuthorDate: 2026-01-08 16:27:32 +0000 > > >> Commit: Rick Macklem <rmacklem@FreeBSD.org> > > >> CommitDate: 2026-01-08 16:27:32 +0000 > > >> > > >> nfsd: Fix handling of hidden/system during Open/Create > > >> > > >> When an NFSv4.n client specifies settings for the archive, > > >> hidden and/or system attributes during a Open/Create, the > > >> Open/Create fails for ZFS. This is caused by ZFS doing > > >> a secpolicy_xvattr() call, which fails for non-root. > > >> If this check is bypassed, ZFS panics. > > >> > > >> This patch resolves the problem by disabling va_flags > > >> for the VOP_CREATE() call in the NFSv4.n server and > > >> then setting the flags with a subsequent VOP_SETATTR(). > > >> > > > > > > The diff doesn't really include enough context to tell -- does this introduce a race window where a file that's supposed to be hidden and/or system is visible without that attribute from a different process? > > I believe that the answer is no. > > > > VOP_CREATE() returns the new file's vnode exclusively locked > > and the update via VOP_SETATTR() happens before the vnode > > lock is released. > > I expected/hoped that that was the case, but just couldn't tell from the > diff itself. I suppose I should have said that "if there is a race, it is in the FreeBSD OpenZFS port and I would consider that a bug". I am not ZFS guy. rick > > Thanks! > > -Ben