From nobody Thu Feb 06 15:40:32 2025 X-Original-To: dev-commits-src-main@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4YphC2240hz5md5M; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:40:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io1-f41.google.com (mail-io1-f41.google.com [209.85.166.41]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "WR4" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4YphC14f0Zz45cS; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 15:40:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from carpeddiem@gmail.com) Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none Received: by mail-io1-f41.google.com with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-844ee166150so29487039f.2; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 07:40:45 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1738856444; x=1739461244; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=62io2cfrQpUM0UG3o7X43jysPfriAo27RFkw9Hv/ykQ=; b=mnGgNQ6tK54ILB0gSqhxeCQiuxsBywDXswNxLmKIJDq9y1SIW0C+/sQ/3U3MCay+UB LSYJsrVYkbzAqnwjK0Hiv9cnE2HQiGXI79xZ4jYJgGK8W6+cYa39IcvBYRY8nHTmL2gm S2IGUVMjFCWQcIGSbWlKpBBPXHN7nzpnug3CUPDgZhGLjriV/WATaXSAUdx70GvW7ngP UL+eRK4h75RouEFLhLr8FNuyzOwq6EYLaKMScUYZ7hnFjXSOAJo/bgN3BL75WnH9yjp3 eyKXYMEu+Qx+P8LL6uSVkJCVd2poomladuD+KTMkGKjgOcaTkDBUS4XAe0yPxZaTLKto DSmw== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCU6I2Jggxe2EnSDZF01I4/YITBWXepl6gJrNhZETIE7mIcAIEPiK+/HbPSlswYnySvU3dw2Fc/4MhLywrB37Txt093S@freebsd.org, AJvYcCWeutNGnCqrUT2QYvA99y589wG7OelNguEeYjK6EMrZegzrI2Y32kFebOQUfezvUP4hepJ2kFrdUOVuo8qep/YRujd4vI0=@freebsd.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YyA0D6JoGVWR49t7w8G4DrdGPXMKwzT6NU45cu8fcDNo0zzR2EK 1mAmSlRyuyGj0DGTdVTSl/FHOFf5lOnKNJPAzxvaW1P/TJKkw2Buz1zCmZKP26daE0fEzyXjrpg iMzILRI3T4HPJyIEpOtzNyhx2shmtfg== X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncs8/y4DSIxCWLmFdpgSw3A1KHb+c4yxTuiMf6szWjdEaRvKkST3w3TM1pwq2qe BP/CTwTCUKnkmSJHCFDDNot7Fr2HyRVdkYhygqd8/AyZBXm+8WJeMMOKutt30evXxhuZYqa0R6o 8VLSecAhsARvV136iYi2qPw89cSOsZVws= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEF6oy6tx8uXmWh81Jsx3LgViuC8tOs/sZZG11yjsBbMMB4oQGCLE9IYEeFSIlI+/Sm/7A1mzOQOOfXNC66Wfs= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6602:7210:b0:844:e21a:e805 with SMTP id ca18e2360f4ac-854ea50e316mr740471839f.9.1738856443887; Thu, 06 Feb 2025 07:40:43 -0800 (PST) List-Id: Commit messages for the main branch of the src repository List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/dev-commits-src-main List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-BeenThere: dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Sender: owner-dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202502061406.516E6Xjf033037@gitrepo.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: From: Ed Maste Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 10:40:32 -0500 X-Gm-Features: AWEUYZnZLFcCQH7cIVvNvFnLJ1plgkuMyGqjhZE4amRn1rW_eFCdGz18Y3N8tss Message-ID: Subject: Re: git: 2f02ab8add08 - main - man9: Delete standalone bus_delayed_attach_children.9 To: John Baldwin Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4YphC14f0Zz45cS X-Spamd-Bar: ---- X-Rspamd-Pre-Result: action=no action; module=replies; Message is reply to one we originated X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[]; ASN(0.00)[asn:15169, ipnet:209.85.128.0/17, country:US] On Thu, 6 Feb 2025 at 09:09, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 2/6/25 09:06, John Baldwin wrote: > > The branch main has been updated by jhb: > > > > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=2f02ab8add0822e985ee2d936fc1ed70933e123e > > > > commit 2f02ab8add0822e985ee2d936fc1ed70933e123e > > Author: John Baldwin > > AuthorDate: 2025-02-06 14:03:34 +0000 > > Commit: John Baldwin > > CommitDate: 2025-02-06 14:06:16 +0000 > > > > man9: Delete standalone bus_delayed_attach_children.9 > > > Sorry for the breakage. Not sure how I had missed the original page when > writing the new one. In general though, I do prefer having a single page > for a group of related functions as it encourages additional prose about > the group. With individual pages for each function there's no good place > for that content. I agree that grouping closely-related functions together in a single page is more useful and this is the right change. I just wasn't sure last night if the new page included all of the information in bus_delayed_attach_children.9.