Re: git: f42421307b11 - main - sys: remove armv6/6.1 support from debug monitor
- In reply to: John Baldwin : "Re: git: f42421307b11 - main - sys: remove armv6/6.1 support from debug monitor"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 05:26:33 UTC
On Mon, Dec 1, 2025 at 8:18 AM John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> wrote:
> On 11/29/25 01:11, Warner Losh wrote:
> > The branch main has been updated by imp:
> >
> > URL:
> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=f42421307b115345ea1a6c8fdf61fbb581e4400f
> >
> > commit f42421307b115345ea1a6c8fdf61fbb581e4400f
> > Author: Minsoo Choo <minsoochoo0122@proton.me>
> > AuthorDate: 2025-11-29 00:34:40 +0000
> > Commit: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
> > CommitDate: 2025-11-29 04:56:36 +0000
> >
> > sys: remove armv6/6.1 support from debug monitor
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Minsoo Choo <minsoochoo0122@proton.me>
> > Reviewed by: imp
> > Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1903
> > ---
> > sys/arm/arm/debug_monitor.c | 30 ------------------------------
> > 1 file changed, 30 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sys/arm/arm/debug_monitor.c b/sys/arm/arm/debug_monitor.c
> > index 7944becbae4d..4d61896a2142 100644
> > --- a/sys/arm/arm/debug_monitor.c
> > +++ b/sys/arm/arm/debug_monitor.c
> > @@ -83,8 +83,6 @@ static uint32_t dbg_breakpoint_num;
> > #define ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_SHIFT 0
> > #define ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_MASK (0xF <<
> ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_SHIFT)
> > #define ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_NS (0x0) /* Not supported */
> > -#define ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_V6 (0x2) /* v6 Debug arch.
> CP14 access */
> > -#define ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_V6_1 (0x3) /* v6.1 Debug arch.
> CP14 access */
> > #define ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_V7 (0x4) /* v7 Debug arch.
> CP14 access */
> > #define ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_V7_1 (0x5) /* v7.1 Debug arch.
> CP14 access */
>
> Humm, I would have probably left these as the register is still valid and
> I find it
> useful to describe the full range of values for registers that we define
> constants for.
> The rest of the removal certainly makes sense.
>
Sure.
> >
> > @@ -594,10 +592,6 @@ dbg_enable_monitor(void)
> > dbg_dscr = cp14_dbgdscrint_get();
> >
> > switch (dbg_model) {
> > - case ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_V6:
> > - case ID_DFR0_CP_DEBUG_M_V6_1: /* fall through */
> > - cp14_dbgdscr_v6_set(dbg_dscr | DBGSCR_MDBG_EN);
> > - break;
>
> Should this function also be removed? Looks to be defined here in
> sys/arm/include/cpu.h:
>
> _WF1(cp14_dbgdscr_v6_set, CP14_DBGDSCRext_V6(%0))
>
OK. I'll do these tweaks..
Warner