Re: git: 07d90ee0a621 - main - kvprintf(): Fix '+' conversion handling
Date: Fri, 06 Sep 2024 21:14:49 UTC
On Fri, Sep 6, 2024 at 2:53 PM Konstantin Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 06, 2024 at 06:35:09PM +0000, Warner Losh wrote:
> > The branch main has been updated by imp:
> >
> > URL:
> https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=07d90ee0a62110e5161bb0b8a3a0b1b9d2beabad
> >
> > commit 07d90ee0a62110e5161bb0b8a3a0b1b9d2beabad
> > Author: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@embedded-brains.de>
> > AuthorDate: 2024-06-14 07:30:28 +0000
> > Commit: Warner Losh <imp@FreeBSD.org>
> > CommitDate: 2024-09-06 18:34:30 +0000
> >
> > kvprintf(): Fix '+' conversion handling
> >
> > For example, printf("%+i", 1) prints "+1". However, kvprintf() did
> > print just "1" for this example. According to PRINTF(3):
> >
> > A sign must always be placed before a number produced by a signed
> > conversion.
> >
> > For "%+r" radix conversions, keep the "+" handling as it is, since
> this
> > is a non-standard conversion. For "%+p" pointer conversions,
> continue
> > to ignore the sign modifier to be in line with libc.
> >
> > This change allows to support the ' conversion modifier in the
> future.
> >
> > Reviewed by: imp
> > Pull Request: https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd-src/pull/1310
> > ---
> > sys/kern/subr_prf.c | 27 +++++++++++++--------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
> Again, isn't rtld_printf needs the same change?
>
This time I don't think so. I'll double check though. I'd checked when this
came in. Thanks for the reminder.