Re: git: 5e248c23d995 - main - tcp: retain some CC signals outside of kernel scope
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2024 20:38:06 UTC
On 2/24/24 12:02 PM, Richard Scheffenegger wrote:
> The branch main has been updated by rscheff:
>
> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=5e248c23d995a059d24f4784d5a256cddd42e557
>
> commit 5e248c23d995a059d24f4784d5a256cddd42e557
> Author: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@FreeBSD.org>
> AuthorDate: 2024-02-24 20:01:54 +0000
> Commit: Richard Scheffenegger <rscheff@FreeBSD.org>
> CommitDate: 2024-02-24 20:01:54 +0000
>
> tcp: retain some CC signals outside of kernel scope
>
> Summary: fix build error after f74352fbcf15341accaf5a92240871f98323215d
>
> Reviewers: #transport!
>
> Subscribers: imp, melifaro, glebius
>
> Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D44066
> ---
> sys/netinet/cc/cc.h | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h b/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h
> index 5b2cb58a24a0..aac0825e5fe1 100644
> --- a/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h
> +++ b/sys/netinet/cc/cc.h
> @@ -121,12 +121,15 @@ struct cc_var {
> #define CCF_HYSTART_CAN_SH_CWND 0x0800 /* Can hystart when going CSS -> CA slam the cwnd */
> #define CCF_HYSTART_CONS_SSTH 0x1000 /* Should hystart use the more conservative ssthresh */
>
> +#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB) */
> typedef enum {
> +#if defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB)
> /* ACK types passed to the ack_received() hook. */
> CC_ACK = 0x0001, /* Regular in sequence ACK. */
> CC_DUPACK = 0x0002, /* Duplicate ACK. */
> CC_PARTIALACK = 0x0004, /* Not yet. */
> CC_SACK = 0x0008, /* Not yet. */
> +#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB) */
> /* Congestion signal types passed to the cong_signal() hook. */
> CC_ECN = 0x0100, /* ECN marked packet received. */
> CC_RTO = 0x0200, /* RTO fired. */
> @@ -138,7 +141,6 @@ typedef enum {
> */
> CC_SIGPRIVMASK = 0xFF000000 /* Mask to check if sig is private. */
> } ccsignal_t;
> -#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) || defined(_WANT_TCPCB) */
Is there a good reason to not just expose all of the enum values always?
--
John Baldwin