Re: git: 1f31e00e19f9 - main - flua: add fbsd module
- Reply: Baptiste Daroussin : "Re: git: 1f31e00e19f9 - main - flua: add fbsd module"
- Reply: Kyle Evans : "Re: git: 1f31e00e19f9 - main - flua: add fbsd module"
- In reply to: Baptiste Daroussin : "git: 1f31e00e19f9 - main - flua: add fbsd module"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 14:58:20 UTC
On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 02:00:54PM +0000, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> The branch main has been updated by bapt:
>
> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=1f31e00e19f9e24d4c891a24973e08a027c4f71c
>
> commit 1f31e00e19f9e24d4c891a24973e08a027c4f71c
> Author: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
> AuthorDate: 2023-09-13 07:43:33 +0000
> Commit: Baptiste Daroussin <bapt@FreeBSD.org>
> CommitDate: 2023-09-27 14:00:00 +0000
>
> flua: add fbsd module
>
> This module is bundled into flua, it only provides for now the exec
> function. The point of the function is to be able to execute a program
> without actually executing a shell.
>
> to use it:
> fbsd.exec({"id", "bapt"})
Hi Baptiste,
How is this different from posix.unistd.exec in the luaposix module?
Wouldn't it be better to add this to the existing posix.unistd namespace
in lposix.c? exec does not seem FreeBSD-specific.
I have a related question: this week I wrote some FreeBSD-specific lua
modules wrapping some system calls like sysctl(2) and cap_enter(2). How
do we want to organize the flua namespace for such things? Should we
have a freebsd.sys namespace for system call wrappers? I would then put
bindings for FreeBSD libraries under freebsd.* or freebsd.lib.*, so we
could have freebsd.lib.procstat, for example.