Re: git: a7469c9c0a50 - main - libc: bsort_s() requires both __BSD_VISIBLE and __EXT1_VISIBLE
- Reply: Brooks Davis : "Re: git: a7469c9c0a50 - main - libc: bsort_s() requires both __BSD_VISIBLE and __EXT1_VISIBLE"
- In reply to: Brooks Davis : "Re: git: a7469c9c0a50 - main - libc: bsort_s() requires both __BSD_VISIBLE and __EXT1_VISIBLE"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 21:35:56 UTC
On 4/19/23 22:29, Brooks Davis wrote: > This is a formal request to revert all commits related to bsort. It > should not have been committed without much broader discussion and IMO > does not belong in the tree. It certainly should not be in the tree > under such a generic name. > > -- Brooks Hi Brooks, I don't have an issue reverting my bsort() patch series, but please clarify your statement first. Who are "we" this time, representing this formal request for revert? Regarding "broader discussion" - what do you mean? The initial discussion was started last September: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-arch/2022-September/000225.html And several people have been asked for review and comments. Please elaborate what "broader discussion" means? Do you mean like getting something into ANSI first? I don't get it. --HPS