Re: git: 8ee579abe09e - main - zfs: fall back if block_cloning feature is disabled
Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2023 18:10:50 UTC
can you please post a review On 4/4/23, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote: > The previously posted patch containing the following fixes all > regressions discussed so far: > > - Rick's fix null ap->a_fsizetd NULL pointer derefernce > - Rick's call vn_generic_copy_file_range() when block_cloning is > disabled > - Martin's call vn_generic_copy_file_range() when any other error > resulting in EXDEV > > > -- > Cheers, > Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> > FreeBSD UNIX: <cy@FreeBSD.org> Web: https://FreeBSD.org > NTP: <cy@nwtime.org> Web: https://nwtime.org > > e^(i*pi)+1=0 > > > On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 09:18:44 -0700 > Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com> wrote: > >> On Tue, 4 Apr 2023 17:30:25 +0200 >> Martin Matuska <mm@FreeBSD.org> wrote: >> >> > So I am now a little bit confused - what is the consensus? :-) >> >> My exmh email client made a mess of that. Let's try this again. >> >> Rick has posted a patch. Your patch should also be incorporated to work >> around other EXDEV errors, but a few lines earlier so it is protected by >> the lock. >> >> There were a couple of typos in Rick's patch (a missing keystroke; >> s/ojset/objset/). >> >> The patch (Rick's null pointer dereference fix, Rick's copy file range >> patch plus your copy file range patch) builds fine on amd64 and i386. >> Installing and testing it now. >> >> A combination of all three patches is attached. It's compile tested but is >> >> currently being installed and will be tested when install is completed. >> > > -- Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik gmail.com>