Re: git: 0e69c959150c - main - dtrace: Fix up %rip for invop probes on x86
- In reply to: Konstantin Belousov : "Re: git: 0e69c959150c - main - dtrace: Fix up %rip for invop probes on x86"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2022 13:45:12 UTC
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 03:36:20PM +0200, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 31, 2022 at 11:12:17PM +0000, Mark Johnston wrote:
> > The branch main has been updated by markj:
> >
> > URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=0e69c959150c0ba38459e9121158016ee34b0d92
> >
> > commit 0e69c959150c0ba38459e9121158016ee34b0d92
> > Author: Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org>
> > AuthorDate: 2022-10-31 23:11:36 +0000
> > Commit: Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org>
> > CommitDate: 2022-10-31 23:11:36 +0000
> >
> > dtrace: Fix up %rip for invop probes on x86
> >
> > When a breakpoint exception is raised, the saved value of %rip points to
> > the instruction following the breakpoint. However, when fetching the
> > value of %rip using regs[], it's more natural to provide the address of
> > the breakpoint itself, so modify the kinst and fbt providers accordingly.
> >
> > Reported by: khng
> > Reviewed by: christos, khng
> > MFC after: 2 months
> > Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D37218
> > ---
> > sys/cddl/dev/fbt/x86/fbt_isa.c | 8 ++++++++
> > sys/cddl/dev/kinst/amd64/kinst_isa.c | 8 +++++++-
> > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/sys/cddl/dev/fbt/x86/fbt_isa.c b/sys/cddl/dev/fbt/x86/fbt_isa.c
> > index 05ec87ab437f..b05ae4cb2c44 100644
> > --- a/sys/cddl/dev/fbt/x86/fbt_isa.c
> > +++ b/sys/cddl/dev/fbt/x86/fbt_isa.c
> > @@ -84,6 +84,12 @@ fbt_invop(uintptr_t addr, struct trapframe *frame, uintptr_t scratch __unused)
> > if ((uintptr_t)fbt->fbtp_patchpoint != addr)
> > continue;
> > fbtrval = fbt->fbtp_rval;
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Report the address of the breakpoint for the benefit
> > + * of consumers fetching register values with regs[].
> > + */
> > + frame->tf_rip--;
> > for (; fbt != NULL; fbt = fbt->fbtp_tracenext) {
> > ASSERT(fbt->fbtp_rval == fbtrval);
> > if (fbt->fbtp_roffset == 0) {
> > @@ -143,6 +149,8 @@ fbt_invop(uintptr_t addr, struct trapframe *frame, uintptr_t scratch __unused)
> > cpu->cpu_dtrace_caller = 0;
> > }
> > }
> > + /* Advance to the instruction following the breakpoint. */
> > + frame->tf_rip++;
> > return (fbtrval);
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/sys/cddl/dev/kinst/amd64/kinst_isa.c b/sys/cddl/dev/kinst/amd64/kinst_isa.c
> > index 6d8d5d521617..e47cfbbf4d4e 100644
> > --- a/sys/cddl/dev/kinst/amd64/kinst_isa.c
> > +++ b/sys/cddl/dev/kinst/amd64/kinst_isa.c
> > @@ -139,6 +139,12 @@ kinst_invop(uintptr_t addr, struct trapframe *frame, uintptr_t scratch)
> > if (kp == NULL)
> > return (0);
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Report the address of the breakpoint for the benefit of consumers
> > + * fetching register values with regs[].
> > + */
> > + frame->tf_rip--;
> > +
> > DTRACE_CPUFLAG_SET(CPU_DTRACE_NOFAULT);
> > cpu->cpu_dtrace_caller = stack[0];
> > DTRACE_CPUFLAG_CLEAR(CPU_DTRACE_NOFAULT | CPU_DTRACE_BADADDR);
> > @@ -162,7 +168,7 @@ kinst_invop(uintptr_t addr, struct trapframe *frame, uintptr_t scratch)
> >
> > if (kpmd->reg1 == -1 && kpmd->reg2 == -1) {
> > /* rip-relative */
> > - rval = frame->tf_rip - 1 + kpmd->instlen;
> > + rval = frame->tf_rip + kpmd->instlen;
> > } else {
> > /* indirect */
> > rval = kinst_regval(frame, kpmd->reg1) +
>
> I am somewhat curious. Is the breakpoint used there means INT3?
Right.
> If yes, then %eip++ most likely points into the middle of the overwritten
> multibyte instruction.
In this case it does not: on x86, FBT only overwrites single-byte
instructions currently, "push %rbp" and "ret", so we can assume that
%eip++ points to next instruction (and for "ret" %rip will be overridden
later anyway). This could change, but it would require other changes to
fbt_invop().
kinst can probe multi-byte instructions, but there we do not increment
the instruction pointer this way. After the probe fires and
kinst_invop() is finished its work, %rip will point to either 1) an
instruction trampoline containing a copy of the probed instruction
(possibly modified if it is %rip-relative) followed by a jmp to the
instruction following the probed instruction, or 2) the computed branch
target for "call" instructions.