Re: git: daf481f3d508 - main - rescue: include ping iff at least one of INET & INET6 is enabled
- Reply: Michael Tuexen : "Re: git: daf481f3d508 - main - rescue: include ping iff at least one of INET & INET6 is enabled"
- In reply to: Gleb Smirnoff : "Re: git: daf481f3d508 - main - rescue: include ping iff at least one of INET & INET6 is enabled"
- Go to: [ bottom of page ] [ top of archives ] [ this month ]
Date: Sun, 02 Jan 2022 17:22:39 UTC
On 2 Jan 2022, at 17:17, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2021 at 06:18:53PM +0000, Ed Maste wrote:
> E> The branch main has been updated by emaste:
> E>
> E> URL: https://cgit.FreeBSD.org/src/commit/?id=daf481f3d508e7497b456e8df7db17c90b623ee0
> E>
> E> commit daf481f3d508e7497b456e8df7db17c90b623ee0
> E> Author: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org>
> E> AuthorDate: 2021-12-31 01:11:31 +0000
> E> Commit: Ed Maste <emaste@FreeBSD.org>
> E> CommitDate: 2021-12-31 18:16:30 +0000
> E>
> E> rescue: include ping iff at least one of INET & INET6 is enabled
> E>
> E> Ping does not build (and serves no purpose) if neither is enabled
> E> (i.e., building WITHOUT_INET and WITHOUT_INET6).
> E>
> E> This is equvalent to a4ef9e58bc0c but for rescue/.
> E>
> E> PR: 260082
> E> Fixes: a4ef9e58bc0c ("sbin: build ping if at least one of...")
> E> Sponsored by: The FreeBSD Foundation
>
> Shouldn't be ping built only with INET and ping6 with INET6?
> Is there any use of ping on machine that doesn't have IPv4?
ping does both these days:
commit 0b1064b00fa3ed9c6ac31e2af1fc56c528d7b47d
Author: asomers <asomers@FreeBSD.org>
Date: Thu Nov 26 04:29:30 2020 +0000
Merge ping6 to ping
There is now a single ping binary, which chooses to use ICMP or ICMPv4
based on the -4 and -6 options, and the format of the address.
Submitted by: Ján Sučan <sucanjan@gmail.com>
Sponsored by: Google LLC (Google Summer of Code 2019)
MFC after: Never
Differential Revision: https://reviews.freebsd.org/D21377
Jess